The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2558 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 144 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 148 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 0, Against 9, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 148 disagreed to.
Section 4—Request for assistance: first declaration
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
Good morning, and welcome to the 29th meeting in 2025 of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. I have received apologies from Paul Sweeney, and Jackie Baillie joins us as a substitute.
Our first and only agenda item is consideration of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill at stage 2. As convener, I do not intend for us to go beyond the debate on amendment 226 today, which is the debate on the group on vulnerable adults.
I will briefly explain the procedure that we will be following during the proceedings for anyone who is watching the meeting. Members should have a copy of the bill, the marshalled list and the groupings. Those documents are available on the bill’s web page on the Scottish Parliament’s website. I will call each amendment individually in the order that is on the marshalled list. The member who lodged the amendment should either move it or say “not moved” when it is called. If the member does not move it, any other member present may do so. The groupings document sets out the amendments in the order in which they will be debated.
There will be one debate on each group of amendments. In each debate, I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in the group to move and speak to that amendment and to speak to all the other amendments in the group. I will call other members with amendments in the group to speak to, but not move, their amendments, and to speak to other amendments in the group if they wish. I will then call any other members who wish to speak in the debate. Members who wish to speak should indicate that by catching my or the clerk’s attention. I will then call the member in charge of the bill, if he has not already spoken in the debate.
Finally, I will call the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up and to either press the amendment or seek to withdraw it. If the amendment is pressed, I will put the question on it. If a member seeks to withdraw an amendment after it has been moved and debated, I will ask whether any member present objects. If there is an objection, I will immediately put the question on the amendment. Later amendments in the group will not be debated again. If they are moved, I will put the question on them straight away.
If there is a division, only committee members are entitled to vote. Voting is done by a show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands raised clearly until the clerk has recorded their names. If there is a tie, I must exercise a casting vote. The committee is also required to consider and decide on each section and schedule of the bill and the long title. I will put the question on each of those provisions at the appropriate point.
Section 1 agreed to.
Section 2—Terminal illness
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 145 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 145 disagreed to.
Amendment 25 moved—[Rhoda Grant].
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 83 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
Against
Baillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Gulhane, Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Harvie, Patrick (Glasgow) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Torrance, David (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
For
Baillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)
Against
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Gulhane, Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Harvie, Patrick (Glasgow) (Green)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Torrance, David (Kirkcaldy) (SNP)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 221 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.