The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 847 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jenny Gilruth
That is a rather broad question, convener. Of course, child poverty is not—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jenny Gilruth
You have to be mindful of the context in which we exist.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jenny Gilruth
I should also have mentioned the early adopter communities, which will help to inform some of the evaluation that Andrew Watson just spoke about. Those communities are giving us data on what works and are helping us to inform what comes next, and the delivery approaches that they have been taking are already showing signs of real progress.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Forgive me, but I believe that the solution in England and Wales has been to increase tuition fees. I do not think that that is something to be considered in Scotland as we have a policy of funding free tuition.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jenny Gilruth
The £130 million is for the pupil equity fund.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Jenny Gilruth
Next year, the Scottish attainment challenge will be 10 years old. It was announced by Nicola Sturgeon, the previous First Minister, some time ago. It is part of our wider aspiration as a Government to eradicate child poverty, which is the point that the convener made at the start of the meeting. That funding stream will end in 2026, and the Government will then have to decide what comes next.
My view as cabinet secretary is that that funding stream has become absolutely essential to the way in which schools are now run. I am sure that, like me, committee members are regularly going in and out of schools. I regularly speak to headteachers about the importance of PEF in their schools in empowering them to take decisions and bring in additionality. It is worth my while to remind the committee that PEF supports more than 3,000 extra staff in our schools, of whom approximately 1,000 are teachers. That additionality in Scotland’s schools as a result of the funding stream has been hugely important.
My view is that it needs to remain in place. The decision about what comes next will of course be a matter in 2026 for the next Scottish Government. I hope that that will be my party, but I do not like to prejudge such things as it is a matter for the electorate. However, we need to think more broadly about resourcing and how, post pandemic, we are responding to some of the challenges in our schools.
In my earlier exchanges with the convener, I spoke about the issue of additional support needs and teacher numbers, which was recently discussed in the chamber and which I am sure that we will come on to talk about. It is hugely important that we have a good relationship with local authorities and help to ensure that they are adequately resourced to meet the additional need in our schools, particularly post pandemic. To think about this in a historical sense, some of the needs in our school have changed astronomically compared to when SAC was first introduced. For example, the changes that we have seen in our schools post pandemic mean that the level of need in relation to ASN is different, and that will require different policy solutions in the future.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
As the committee will be aware, Richard Harry, the executive director of qualifications and assessment in the Welsh exam board, carried out an independent peer review of the report. Fiona Robertson can speak about the detail of the methodology that was applied, because the methodology for the independent peer review was decided by the SQA, not by the Scottish Government.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
It is therefore quite unique.
I take the member’s point on board, but the issue that I have as cabinet secretary is that the report that I have been presented with does not present a substantive evidence base for me to issue a directive. I think that that is the point that the member is making. If that evidence base exists, I will consider it. However, the report that I have been presented with, which is a rigorous report—I am sure that all committee members have read it in detail—looks very thoroughly at the question paper, at the marking guidelines and at how they were applied. I do not have—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
Of course. On page 10 of the report, it talks through the qualification changes in recent years. It also makes a point about the qualification requirements for history, in particular, not having been consistent since 2018. There have been changes to the qualifications largely as a result—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Jenny Gilruth
I very much recognise the strength of feeling in relation to the matter. In my experience, it is quite unusual that the qualifications body would instruct a review of such a nature. I am not sure whether that has happened previously in other subject areas.