The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
If I understood you correctly, you said that the fact that the funds are ring fenced is, to some extent, an advantage for local authorities, because it means that that money is not washed into the general calculation around the block grant. Therefore, there are advantages for local authorities as well as for tourism businesses in the money being ring fenced to some extent.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Okay.
I have a last question. Clearly, one of the key issues regarding the relationship with business and regulation in general is the cumulative impact. Has there been any consideration of how the proposal would interact with everything else that is impacting on business, or has been proposed for business? What is the mechanism for assessing all the regulatory proposals that are in play?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Will you give examples of the things that might or might not be included in that definition? It sounds like a great definition, but the devil is in the detail, and we need to figure out what exactly might or might not be included.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Absolutely, and, as a consequence, there could be increased revenue for the local authorities and others from the increase in visitor numbers.
Has any thought been given to the proposals from the STA about the mechanism for deciding what money is spent on? You talked about a group in each local authority that has the tax in place involving the local authority and businesses, which might make the decisions about or at least oversee what the money is spent on.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
So it is on the agenda but not prescriptive.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Sure—but that works in both directions. They could come back and say that there are six other things hitting business that you need to have another look at, so that they are considered.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Is there a role for the Scottish Government not to mandate but to guide, direct and help to share the best examples of that in order to indicate the art of the possible?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Ivan McKee
Yes. Realpolitik gets in the way, unfortunately—that is life.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Ivan McKee
I am old enough to remember the politics of that period of reorganisation. I do not want to go into it too much, but it was perhaps done for reasons other than finding an optimal solution to local government boundaries. We might talk about that a wee bit more, so I do not want to jump too much into that space. There are tensions between what is done at a macro level, what is done at a micro level and what is a postcode lottery versus local control and how to navigate that.
There is a big question about whether people look at the situation and think, “Maybe it’s not the right answer but, frankly, the amount of work and cost involved in restructuring is potentially a bit scary,” so they back off. There is a question about how much can be done within the existing structure, but I think that we will pick that up later, so I will stop there, convener.