The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
If I understand what you are saying, the majority of the 21 member states—every one, excluding five—have a flat rate. Is there a banded flat rate within that so that different types of accommodation providers pay a different flat rate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning. My question is about the way of calculating a visitor levy and whether a flat rate makes more sense than a percentage rate. It is clear that there are pros and cons to both approaches. We have heard about complexity versus simplicity, costs and the potentially regressive nature of one compared with the other. It would be good to get a sense of how you see that and what examples there are from across your sector.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
I suppose that the businesses would argue that those costs are actually there, so they are having to pay for it, in effect.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
When you say “no financial impact”, do you mean no additional revenue to collect?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
I suppose that that is an incentive for councils to keep the scheme simple.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Does anyone else want to come in on this? No. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Does that include set-up costs in the first year and then lower costs in subsequent years?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Okay, thanks. Would anyone else like to come in on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, panel. There has been quite a bit of conversation already about the importance of the tourism sector and businesses and small businesses in your local authority areas. It was great to hear that. Following on from Pam Gosal’s question, we heard from the business panel last week that there is a concern that the way in which the bill is written, in that it specifies that the liable person is the accommodation provider, means that the levy is a tax on business rather than a tax on visitors. There are also concerns that accommodation businesses will in effect be asked to be unpaid tax collectors for local authorities. Given that councils are able to recoup their costs for operating the scheme from the revenue raised, do you think that there is a case for businesses being able to recoup their costs from the revenue that is raised by the scheme?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Ivan McKee
Does anyone online want to comment?