The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, panel.
When we talk about remote and rural healthcare, we often look at it through the same lens as we look at healthcare elsewhere. We consider that, for various reasons, healthcare in rural areas is not as good as we would like it to be in comparison with the rest of the country, and we look at how we can improve its standing.
That is hugely important, but I want to flip that around and look at the subject through another lens—in relation to digitisation, remote healthcare, telehealth and so on. There are clearly opportunities for us not only to get ahead of the curve in how we deploy those technologies at scale in rural communities and drive up health outcomes as a consequence, but to position Scotland as a leading global player in those technologies. I know that we have done a lot of that already, and that there are great examples of it in the Highlands and Islands and elsewhere. To what extent do you see the national centre focusing on such opportunities, as it does on the many existing challenges that we have discussed?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Have you specific examples of technology and digitisation having been deployed in rural areas in advance of that happening elsewhere in the country, or are there plans in which that is in train?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Is the plan clear enough on what those measurable deliverables are, or is there still work to be done on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
On the core question about whether the women’s health plan focuses on the right areas, are you comfortable that it does that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
You are absolutely correct. My wife tells me that frequently.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
It is an interesting observation that more engagement leads to poorer medical outcomes.
The plan has a big focus on inequality, which is great. It is interesting that women’s health outcomes are significantly better than men’s for many headline issues, such as alcohol and drugs, Covid and even heart conditions. I think that I am right in saying that men’s death rates are still significantly worse than women’s. How do you approach those differences, in terms what can be measured?
Typically, when we look at an inequality issue, we would say that one group is performing worse than others and the objective would be to close the gap. In this situation, there are many measures, such as life expectancy, on which women are performing significantly better than men. How would you measure success in closing that inequality gap?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, and thank you for coming in this morning. I have a few questions about the plan. I think that it is true to say that you came into post a period of time after “Women’s Health Plan” was pulled together and launched. To get a sense of whether the plan covers the areas that you think it should and whether its areas of focus are correct, you helpfully unpicked the fact that some conditions are female only, others are shared, and there are some issues that affect the latter category. Do you think that balance is correct?
It was interesting to read in the plan some of the stuff about how women want to play an active role, share decision making and have access to information. That also applies to men. Could any learning from the plan be applied more widely?
I have some more points to make but perhaps you could pick up on those first.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Okay. Just to be clear, when you talk about young people vaping, are those people who have ever used it, who occasionally use it or who use it on a very regular basis?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, panel. I would like to explore the prevalence of vaping among young people. We have been given data that sort of shows a picture, but, to be honest, there are lots of different data points taken at different times from different cohorts who were asked different questions. I would like to get a sense of what the data tells us about the prevalence of vaping among young people, what that prevalence looks like by different age cohorts and how that is moving over time. Is it increasing over time?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Ivan McKee
It seems that they do not. You have given a comprehensive answer and nobody feels the need to add to it.
To follow on from that, I believe that the number of young people who smoke is still reducing, but you can clarify that. Does the data suggest—obviously, this is hard to know in absolute terms—that young people who would perhaps in the past have smoked are vaping instead, or is the increase in vaping much more substantial than the reduction in young people smoking over that time period?