The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Ivan McKee
Is there a sense that, now that the national centre has been put together, its structure and priorities do not necessarily reflect what you were expecting?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Ivan McKee
Are there any specific examples that you would like to highlight?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
That is great—thank you.
Dr Makin, do you want to come back in?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
I will explore that a wee bit further; it came up earlier in the session. Redesign of service delivery in remote and rural settings is, through necessity, perhaps more advanced than it might be elsewhere.
To what extent do you feel that remote and rural health boards are leading the way, through technology or service redesign, with processes that are then adopted elsewhere? Is that part of how things are developing, or not really?
Do you feel that, as remote and rural areas, you are at the back of the queue, or that you are, in certain areas, at the front because you are developing technologies and processes in advance of anywhere else?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Good morning, panel.
I will ask about technology and digital services. We touched on the matter slightly in comments on the potential to exacerbate inequalities, but I will focus on understanding what role new and emerging technologies can play in providing support in the rural environment. The need for those technologies is probably greater in that environment, which gives the potential for them to be rolled out more rapidly in the remote and rural areas. What do you see happening with those technologies, and what else can be done to roll them out further? I am asking about digital connectivity, but also about medicines delivery by drones, sensor technology in homes and any other technologies that you might be aware of that are in use.
Who wants to come in first?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
I do not have an issue with the substance of the legislation; it is more of a comment on process. Perhaps we could ask the clerks to do some background work on it. Clearly, the issue has arisen because there was an error in the drafting of the legislation. I am interested in getting more background information on how often that happens and on the process improvements that are looked at in order to reduce it. What is the process for finding such errors—how was this one found?—and what is the risk of them not being found in legislation that has already been considered? I would be grateful for any data that the clerks can pull together on that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Ivan McKee
Thank you. That is helpful. The point about people seeing things in a more positive light is well made. Our saying that remote and rural communities have been at the forefront in adopting the technology, which is then rolled out more widely, is helpful.
Does anyone else want to come in?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
On you go.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
In your response to the information commissioner’s report, you said that you accepted the recommendations “in principle”. I do not want to get too geeky on the semantics, but I want to explore what that means. When you send the response back, will there be details about any parts of the recommendations that you are not accepting?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Ivan McKee
The clarification from the minister is welcome.
I will ask a bit about the costs of FOI. I cannot recall the number of requests, but we have had a briefing on it and it runs to, I think, many, many tens of thousands across the public sector annually. I think that it is increasing, which clearly carries a cost with it. Do you have any sense of how much of the Scottish Government’s total cost, which is somewhere in excess of £700 million per year, is a consequence of compliance with FOI legislation and what that looks like across the broader public sector? Is there any work on or any view or assessment of what those numbers might look like?