The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Officials can supply more detail. Those costs are obviously demand led—they depend on how many journeys are made. The relevant operator receives the funding back for those journeys. Officials will tell me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that the reduction was a consequence of uptake being not as much as expected—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I think that we will need to come back to you on that very specific point.
Oh—we might have an answer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes, we will send you that and what it has been in previous years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Clearly, when we set inquiries up—there are a number of them running—the costs of those are—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Well, I would not say that. At the start, they are—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
It is a function of the environment in which we operate. If we were a normal, independent country and we had borrowing powers that we could exercise, we would be able to smooth that out, but, because we have very tight borrowing restrictions and we have to deal with—“the emergency stage” is probably too strong a phrase—the consequences of spending decisions that are taken at Whitehall, we need to balance the variables and try to predict what is going to happen down the road. The alternative would be that we had not received consequentials to anything like that extent, in which case we would be sitting here having a very different conversation. You would rightly be criticising us for not having taken steps to ensure that the budget came in on balance—which, again, is a requirement of a devolved Administration.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
As I say, it is a function of the environment that we operate in. The alternative would be that we had come to committee in the autumn, earlier in the financial year, before those numbers were published, and said, “We expect to get £1.43 billion from the UK Government and we’re going to operate based on the consequences of that. We won’t make any changes in the budget—we won’t cut anything or impose any controls—as we assume that all that money will come flowing down the track.” If that had not happened, it would have been too late in the financial year to take steps on it.
As I say, the reason why these things move is not because there is a lack of policy coherence but because we need to operate in an environment in which there are many substantial unknowns. You asked what the central planning assumption was. We expected to get a number, but there is a huge variation around that. It always operates within a range. We said that the £1.4 billion was at the top end of what we expected that range to be and the range that we planned within. However, there is a huge variation and it could have been a much smaller number. If it had been, we would have had to put measures in place to react to that. If we were in a position where we did not have the borrowing constraints that we have because we are a devolved Administration, we would have been able to take a more stable view throughout the year and deal with the matter in a very different way.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Okay. I will see what we have and send it on to you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
We can endeavour to find the answer to that question if you are interested, convener—absolutely. However, the inquiries are independent and the cost base is driven by the activities that are undertaken by each inquiry.
The issue of how inquiries are budgeted for has been raised previously, but the Government’s position is that we respond to the costs that are incurred by the inquiry.
10:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
This is about ensuring value for money, too. The physics of projects does not respect year ends; projects move forward and continue. People do not stop work at year end and then restart—the project continues right through. When it comes to matching up the finances, we need to move the money from one year to the next through the process of bringing it back in and then allocating it back out again.