The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
That is a helpful clarification. I have one other question to ask. You may or may not want to give any details on this, but one of the things that has been mentioned a number of times this morning in relation to behaviours and impact is inaccurate medical information being given out. Do you want to share any examples of that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Thank you for your interesting research on the issue. I have a couple of questions about impact. You mentioned a couple of legal cases that have been unsuccessful. Are you aware of any legal challenges that have been successful?
Where legislation is in place, have there been convictions or have charges been brought? You are looking at the issue globally, and some jurisdictions are very different; I am interested in your perspective on jurisdictions such as Ireland that are more similar to Scotland. I also have a follow-up question on the UK legislation.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
That is fine. I suppose that it is too early to say how such charges progress, if and when they are brought, with regard to giving some clarity on what behaviours are or are not acceptable or fall within the legislation.
My other questions follow up on the point about the UK legislation. If I understand it correctly, the provisions for abortion zones in that legislation are couched in terms of broader zones in relation to other protest activities. Is that correct? That might include people who are protesting outside workplaces because they are not happy about what is manufactured there, people who are protesting outside other facilities because they are not happy about something that is happening in a specific area, or other forms of political protest. Is that how the UK legislation is framed?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
No—that is fine. If I understand it correctly, that legislation makes a clear distinction between other protests and abortion zone provisions. Is that correct?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Right—so that is excluded from the cost calculation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Could that have a significant impact on your case load?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Good morning. I would like to explore the backlog and the case load numbers. You say that you have seen the number of cases reducing. Can you give us a sense of why that is? Do you anticipate that that will continue to be the case?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
I was going to ask about complexity. Clearly, such cases bump into the cost restriction at some point, which I suppose puts a limit on how complex cases can get before they breach that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Okay—I understand.
Mr Hamilton, you mentioned redefining the process. I think that there is a different triage process and so on. It is good to hear all that. More work on proactive release of information in a standardised form might help, so I assume that that is on your agenda, but will you confirm that that is the case?
Also, to what extent are you looking at new technology, such as artificial intelligence and so on, to speed up the process?