The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I ask for clarity on a question that was raised in the evidence session last week about the information that is provided in the clinics by staff about the options for women who come in.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Good morning. I would like to explore a couple of areas. First, have you or your colleagues encountered protests at your workplace? If so, what impact has that had, or can it have, on staff?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I will follow up a couple of points. Professor Cameron’s reference to counter-demonstrators was interesting with regard to the atmosphere that that creates. A couple of you mentioned that false information is given out at protests and I would like to hear about some examples of that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Ivan McKee
The last point that I want to raise is about the exemptions on trade union activity—picketing. It is clear that we are working our way through the issue and that there are human rights challenges on many sides. I would like to understand your perspective on the rationale behind a potential trade union exemption. Does what is in the bill meet those requirements? The right to trade union activity is a fundamental human right, as is the right to protest, so I would like to understand your perspective on how we unpick that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Is there a risk that trade union activity could cause the same kinds of concerns that we have identified in relation to existing protests?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Let us go back to Adam Tomkins’s second point, about holding Government to account. We have had a lot of good discussion this morning about the value of committees and inquiries in raising issues and taking evidence, and in scrutinising legislation, given the two-way street that can operate effectively in that regard. Do you want to highlight anything as a good example of committees holding Government to account?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Ivan McKee
I welcome the witnesses. Thank you for your open dialogue and your wide-ranging input on this important subject.
Professor Tomkins, I was quite taken by your outlining, in your introduction, the role of the Parliament and its three functions. That is a very helpful way to think about it.
I take issue with you slightly on one aspect, however, which I would like to explore a wee bit more. I think that you both said that the role of a committee is not to debate issues. I understand what you mean with regard to members having an opportunity to grandstand and make political points. However, there is perhaps an issue around the role of committees in allowing issues to be raised that would otherwise not be raised. I would like to get your reflections on that. The Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee is one structural manifestation of that, but the opportunity arises in all committees. I am taken by the fact that, when I encounter people outside Parliament who are coming to give evidence to a committee, the fact that they are engaging with the process in that way is a big deal for them.
As a follow-on from that—this is perhaps quite an existential question—what is the outcome of that process? Is it just that people come in and make their views known to a committee in evidence, as part of an inquiry or whatever, and that does not necessarily go anywhere? I go back to the point that Annie Wells made about legacy reports. When I came back to committees after a five-year absence as a minister, I thought, “Oh, you’re still talking about the same things you were talking about five years ago. The same people are coming in and we’re asking the same questions, so what’s actually changed?” I suppose that my question is, what changes as a consequence of that process?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Ivan McKee
My final question—Johann Lamont has already commented on this—is on elected conveners. What are your thoughts on that idea?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Thank you for clarifying that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Ivan McKee
Good morning, panel. Thanks very much for coming along to share your thoughts with us.
I want to focus on the aspects of the bill that will create criminal offences, and specifically on the approach of prohibiting behaviours rather than specific activities. I would like to get your perspective on that and your sense of how that would work. Do you have any concerns about that, or do you think that that is the right approach? Those sections of the bill also provide for penalties for people who breach the legislation. What is your perspective on that?
I will open up those questions to anyone who wants to come in.