The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
Thank you. The next issue that I want to touch on—I am sorry, do you want to come in, convener?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
Does anyone else have a perspective on that issue?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
I want to touch on the bill’s provisions on notional spending and spending limits for overseas third-party campaigners, which will bring Scottish elections into line with reserved elections. Professor Clark raised issues about reporting periods, timing and all that. Can I get your perspective on those issues?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
That is no problem.
On the postponement of elections and the bill’s provisions, I would like your perspective on publishing the statement of reasons, any tests that should be applied when the decision is taken and how the decision should be taken and by whom, to ensure that it is free from political influence.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
The next issue that I want to touch on is the bill’s proposals on digital imprints, with the bolt-on provision on unpaid-for digital material by relevant third-party organisations. What is your perspective on that approach?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
Good morning. Ahlam Hamoud Al-Bashiri briefly touched on the issue of extending the rights of candidacy to foreign nationals with limited leave to remain. If you want to give us your perspective on that, that would be very helpful. I will then open up the discussion to the other witnesses.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Ivan McKee
That is very helpful and lays out clearly a very important perspective.
Do any other witnesses have perspectives that they would like to share? Does anyone want to come in online?
I also want to ask about the issue of dual mandates. MSPs can hold another office as a councillor or as an MP. I would like to hear the panel’s views on how appropriate dual mandates are. Does Alice Kinghorn-Gray want to kick off on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
I will do my best.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
Thank you. That is helpful. Who should make that call? Should there be wording that specifies what would need to pertain relating to public safety or whatever? What are your thoughts on that?
You also said that a longer postponement would be more helpful and effective than a shorter one, but there are other issues to consider. We have heard evidence about what would happen to postal votes, the electoral register and the timescale. A range of things would get worse with a longer postponement. What is your reflection on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Ivan McKee
That is useful. Is there a requirement to specify rules on that, whether in the bill or in guidance, or is it sufficient to have on the shelf a manual that people might or might not refer to? I am thinking through a scenario in which difficult decisions would need to be made that might end up having a political slant—around postal votes that had already been cast, or on what would happen if somebody had spent most of their money and somebody else had spent hardly any because they were going to spend it in the second half of the campaign, for example. Would the counter be reset? Is there a need to nail that stuff down at this stage, so that people would not spend a lot of time having a big bun fight, if such a scenario were to transpire?