The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
I am sorry, but could you restate your question, so that I can make sure that you picked me up correctly?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
As I have said, the ministerial control framework is in place. Any proposed public body would go through that process and be subject to a robust assessment of why we needed it. The presumption is that no more public bodies are to be created—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
—unless there is a strong case for doing so. Frankly, we would want to consider the scope for having fewer public bodies.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
Even where it is not the Government’s proposal, it will have significant input. At the end of the day, the Government, even if it is a minority in Parliament, holds sway over whether a bill goes through Parliament.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
It is not the Government’s role to say what commissioners there should or should not be, or to review the situation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
That is a good question. Looking at the landscape, we see that there is a wide range of different bodies. The Auditor General for Scotland, for instance, is very much independent of Government, and rightly so—and the role adds a lot of value, because of that. There are bodies that are not SPCB bodies that are very much viewed as independent, and they fulfil their functions very effectively as a consequence; there are other bodies, including the commissioners that we are talking about, that are SPCB supported.
The structure has grown up over time. It is not as if people sat down and designed it from the get-go, deciding, “This is the way it will work,” or, “These bodies will all be Parliament bodies, and those bodies will not be.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
I have already said it four times, but I will say for the fifth time that the ministerial control framework is very robust, as is the Government’s position on the creation of new public bodies in general. That extends to new commissioners. We are very conscious of having too many, and we are taking steps on it. We are robustly taking a position on it. In my new role, that is my absolute intention. We are not ignoring it. I only made the point that there is a bigger landscape out there, which is also in focus and being considered, where there are much larger sums of money to be saved.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
That is a good question. My experience in the Government up until now has primarily been in the economic space. I know how we work with economic agencies, although that is a very different relationship. I do not know whether the officials have any specific comments on how Government formally engages with and monitors the independent bodies under the Government remit.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
I think that it was Jackson Carlaw who talked about the various stages of evolution of this landscape, through inquiries and other bodies that were set up. Now, we are in a position in which many interest groups want to have a commissioner.
I heard the evidence from Age Scotland, and I understand why an advocacy group would want to have a commissioner for their specific interest, because it would allow them to raise the profile of, and to advocate more effectively to the Government for, their specific interest group. I understand why it would want to do that.
It is important to look at the broader public sector body landscape to understand what it should look like in order for it to be as cost-effective and efficient as possible, and the Government takes the lead on that. The basic principle is that we want to keep things as simple as possible, and a broad proliferation of public sector bodies that duplicate functions is not the most efficient way of doing that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Ivan McKee
Again, you would need to talk to advocacy groups about how they see that, but—