The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1407 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
If it is done in a targeted and specific way for a specific purpose, yes, of course.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
No, thanks.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
I would need to go and check the details on the specifics of that but there was quite an involved process to be gone through.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
As I said, anyone who is taking advantage of the incentives has to comply with all legal requirements. If you want me to follow up on anything more specific, I am happy to do so if you write to me, but that is the situation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
Yes. However, looking at the context, the work in relation to investment zones and green ports has largely been focused on the attraction of international investment for cluster developments.
The package of £320 million from the UK Government includes money to cover the foregone loss of the cost for LBTT—that money is covered by the UK Government in any event. For the Scottish Government, it is all upside, because it is about the other revenue that you get from income tax or other taxes over time from the economic activity and its multiplier effects. There is no loss to the Scottish Government per se in that regard.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
I was heavily involved in the green ports process, but I was not involved in the investment zones process. My understanding, though, is that a rigorous assessment involving a number of criteria was undertaken jointly by the UK and Scottish Governments. There are two investment zones in Scotland and eight, I think, across England and Wales, and, in the process that was undertaken, there was an assessment of a number of factors and the decision was made on the basis agreed between the two Governments.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
As I have said, I was not involved in that process. My understanding is that a rigorous process was undertaken by the two Governments, with a number of criteria considered as to where the investment zones should be located.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
Certainly, the reliefs are broadly aligned in terms of the detail. I do not know whether there are any areas where they diverge, but my understanding is that they are aligned.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Ivan McKee
Do you have examples of specific companies that this applies to?