The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
A number of things are happening there. The invest to save fund is one lever, the orders are another and we have other levers on-going. We have talked about the estates programme, the procurement frameworks, digitisation and the automation programme that has already saved a significant amount of money, and those programmes continue. The invest to save fund is targeted specifically at the harder-to-crack challenges, such as the cross-portfolio co-operation that is required, and there are improvements that might take a period of time to generate savings.
To directly answer your question on the invest to save fund, that process has opened. We have already received the first trawl back of those submissions. Officials are looking at those now, and I will see them in the next week or two. Then, before the end of this month, we will identify the projects that we are taking forward with regard to investment of that £30 million.
Those projects will identify how much investment they want, what savings they will deliver as a consequence and in what timescale. As we select those projects and aggregate them, we will be able to answer the question directly and monitor how they are delivered.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
To flip that, one of the big criticisms that we rightly get from the third sector and many other organisations is that we do not have multiyear funding, and that affects zero-based budgeting. We go back every year with a blank piece of paper and decide who is going to get the money. Rolling that uncertainty out more widely across the public sector could cause more challenges than it solves problems, so we need to be careful about what we mean by zero-based budgeting.
That said, this is about taking a step back to consider the purpose and deliverables of a group of public bodies in a particular part of the landscape and whether the current configuration is the most effective one or whether we should do things differently. At that point, you would start with a blank piece of paper when considering the minimum number of bodies that would be needed to deliver what you wanted and whether it would be cost effective to make a transformation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
It would be a multiyear approach, because, by its nature, it would take a longer period. You would not do that wholesale; you would look for the low-hanging fruit. To be honest, we have done that in relation to the police and colleges, and we have cited other, minor examples in which the functions of bodies have been brought together. We will continue to look for ways to do that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
You would need to have an evidential base for doing something differently. I suppose that we are working in three dimensions. We are first looking at—as the convener said—how much money an increase would raise. I am looking at the data that is in front of me. Officials will correct me if I am wrong, but there seems to be about 110,000 tonnes at the lower rate, so a £1 increase would bring in an extra £100,000. That would be welcome, but it would not shift the dial on the budget.
If you start to increase that rate by too much and the differential grows, is there the potential for waste tourism? That is the last thing we want, because it makes everything more difficult.
Then there is the question how the current rates are driving behavioural change. With the numbers coming down year on year, it looks as though the tax is having the intended policy impact of driving such behavioural change. However, I would be happy to look at the evidence and to do some modelling as best we can with the information that we have to see what making some changes in future years might deliver.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Sorry, convener—I just want to correct the record, I have just noticed in my notes that there were about 600,000 tonnes at the lower rate, and 110,000 tonnes of that was soil. There was other material in that figure as well, so it is more significant, although not in the big scheme of things.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Indeed, we shall.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
That is a matter for the First Minister, and I do not want to say any more on that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
It is already available. It was published last November.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes, absolutely. Last year, we did it on historical data, and we are now doing it on budgeted data. We are getting ahead of the curve and we will establish an efficient process. We do not want collection of another big load of data to be put on public bodies. We will update that.
The 2022-23 data is available, and the savings that we have delivered on estates and procurement and other aspects of the hard savings are already there.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I would not want to make any such suggestions. I am sure that the committee will make up its own mind on what matters it wants to put forward. I would say that it is genuinely a privilege to serve as a minister in the Scottish Government, regardless of any issues around salary sacrifice.