The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Thank you for raising that issue, which I know you have raised before. There have been several tweaks made over time to the eligibility process, as various issues have arisen. We can certainly look at what scope there is to address that issue.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
The purpose of the policy is to raise revenue and rebalance the market so that people who want to buy a house to live in—first-time buyers or otherwise—have a competitive edge over those who are buying a property to let.
The data shows that the number of registered landlords is broadly flat, and the number of registered properties has increased over the past two and a half to three years, so the policy is not having an impact on that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
Thank you very much.
09:32 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
They are linked in the sense that, if you want to build new properties, there are a range of factors to be considered that are relevant to those decisions. However, at that end of the market, ADS does not apply to the purchase of more than six properties.
A typical buy-to-let landlord does not build a new property to put on the market; they buy an existing property to let it out. A property is either going to be bought by them or by someone who wants to live in it, but the total number of properties in the market stays the same.
09:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
On the build-to-rent market, transactions that involve more than six properties are excluded from ADS.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
There is quite a lot in that question. With regard to the impact on the number of properties, clearly the number of properties in the market will remain the same. They will be owned either by landlords or by residents—that is, owner-occupiers. The trend over a number of years has been a gradual reduction in the number of second homes from 27,000 to about 24,000 since 2016-17 or thereabouts, but it is hard to ascertain how much of that has arisen as an impact of this specific measure.
There has been a 14 per cent reduction in the number of ADS transactions, but there has been an 8 per cent reduction in the overall number of LBTT transactions. The reduction in the number of ADS transactions has been slightly higher than the number of property transactions in general, but it is hard to know how much of that is due to the specific measure.
With regard to the increase in ADS from 4 per cent to 6 per cent, the SFC based its forecast on an assessment of behavioural impact, but what we have seen is that the revenue from ADS has been higher than that forecast. The SFC has used the same methodology for its projections, which suggest a significant increase of £30 million per year or thereabouts in the revenue coming through from ADS as a consequence of those changes being taken into account.
The final point to make is about the number of registered landlords and registered properties. Over the past three years, the number of landlords has been broadly similar, and the number of properties has slightly increased, so I suggest that there is no evidence that there has been any impact on the market.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Ivan McKee
It will not impact on landlords who currently own property; it will apply only when a landlord buys a property, and that cost would be factored into the economics of that investment decision. The market rent would be understood by the landlord when making that decision, so that would all be factored in.
Rent is a separate issue in terms of rent controls and the proposed legislation in the Housing (Scotland) Bill. How rent controls are tackled is a separate issue.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Ivan McKee
It will ask for opinions on where the bands and levels should be and for the evidence to support that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Ivan McKee
I defer to officials on specific timing, but we plan to get the consultation launched early in the new year. It is important to remember that this is all in connection with debts that have not been paid.
09:45It was assessed that an equality impact assessment was not required. The impact is on people who earn less—that goes without saying. It is about getting the balance right between how much they can afford and then, coming to councils, ensuring that there is not a disincentive for payment if debts are not pursued below that level. It is important to get that right.
Perhaps Richard Dennis can comment on the timing of the consultation.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Ivan McKee
If you express it in weekly amounts, it is not a round number, but I take your point. I will defer to Richard Dennis on the specifics of that.
You are right to a certain extent—you need to pick a number, and a round number is as good as any other number, plus it makes it easier to communicate and understand. We are making the increase from the previous amount to the lower level of £750, which seemed to be the right place to pitch it. However, you are absolutely right about the lack of data in this space, which, as Richard Dennis said, makes it difficult to be able to understand the impact of a threshold and to do a more evidence-based calculation on where we should pitch it.