The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
That is an interesting point. It will be harder to identify soft costs such as staff time and so on, but I absolutely think that it will be worth doing. Moreover, quite a lot of time and resource will be spent—perhaps rightly so—on preparing for inquiries. In the interest of transparency, we should seek to look at those numbers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
No, but we can get back to you on that—unless others have the information to hand.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
It is in that portfolio because that gives us flexibility. Things will happen. I mentioned year-end audit adjustments, which are an unknown number, so we do not know where they will land. That is the whole point of having a contingency. There can still be variation in demand-led schemes. There are other issues, such as the storms perhaps triggering Bellwin payments to local authorities. There are a number of known unknowns as we go through to the end of the year.
Having that £350 million held centrally allows us the flexibility to respond to issues and allocate funds, depending on where we see demand coming through as we get towards the end of the year. Of course, any money that is left unutilised moves forward and can be spent in next year’s budget.
The answer to your question is that the money is held there because it gives us more flexibility. Of course, we do not yet know what the year-end audit adjustments will be, which is the whole point of having that contingency.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Sorry—when you said 84 per cent, did you mean 84 per cent of the total reduction?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Yes. I think that there have been some changes with regard to how that limit is treated.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I suppose that the operator would need to have the capacity as well as the funding. If you need any more specific information, we will try to get the details.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
Absolutely. The nature of the programmes is that they are funded by the UK and Scottish Governments, so we need to work together on them. If there is slippage in those programmes, we work with the UK Government to reprofile that funding. Clearly, that funding is not coming in, because it is not going out to those projects as a result of slippage.
Scott, is there anything that you want to cover on the specifics of the question?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
I move,
That the Finance and Public Administration Committee recommends that the Budget (Scotland) Act 2024 Amendment Regulations 2025 [draft] be approved.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
We shall supply those detailed numbers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ivan McKee
We did not spend any ScotWind funds this year because we did not need to. We managed to balance the budget without doing that. That is positive, because it means that we will be able to use next year’s money for what it is intended to be used for: supporting capital and other investments that allow us to transition to a net zero economy.
A number of areas have already been identified, and the biggest part of that funding is going into offshore wind projects. Scott, do we have any specifics on when the projects will be delivered?