The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 309 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Ash Regan
You might be aware that the committee has run a bit of community engagement on the topic. One theme that came across strongly was that consumers lament the fact that they are always paying extra charges and that they are seen to have the responsibility to drive that change. Consumers thought that manufacturers and retailers should take more responsibility. What are the panel’s views on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Ash Regan
Right—thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Ash Regan
Ewan MacDonald-Russell mentioned the UK’s extended producer responsibility. I finish by asking the panel for their views on coherence with other parts of the UK. We have previously seen issues with the internal market act; presumably, that might affect the proposals for this bill. What are your views on that? How should the Scottish Government approach that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Ash Regan
That is helpful; would anyone else like to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Ash Regan
Good morning. I will continue in the direction that Ben Macpherson was taking in his questioning. There were issues with the process that was followed for the DRS and with the engagement with businesses on the detail of the DRS. I guess that lessons will be learned from that.
If we reflect on those lessons, what should the Government’s process look like? The Government is trying to decide which single-use items to impose a charge on. We have touched on certain categories of item for which such a charge might not be appropriate. What should that decision-making process look like? How should it differ from what we have seen before? How can we best engage with business on this topic?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Ash Regan
Yes, thank you, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Ash Regan
Scottish Parliament committees are always interested in what is working well elsewhere, even if it is far afield. Are there lessons to be learned from elsewhere in how we could better support life sciences and the industry?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Ash Regan
Obviously, for the industry and for the Government, the Covid-19 pandemic led to changes to the way in which we worked and to the level of support that was provided. Are there things that we can learn from that? Should we continue some things and not leave them in the past?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Ash Regan
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Ash Regan
Good morning. I want to start by asking about land reform. We have had the community right to buy for about 20 years now, but only 3 per cent of Scotland is in community ownership. I would be interested to know whether the Scottish Government is happy with that level. Would you consider that the policy has been successful?