The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 309 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Ash Regan
Thank you. I have a question on detransitioners, if I may.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Ash Regan
The minister talked about one United Kingdom, but it is Scotland that produces 90 per cent of the oil and gas for the UK, and it is Scotland that will be left with no refinery. Would the UK Government be so relaxed about the situation if the boot were on the other foot and England had no capacity to refine oil?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Ash Regan
[Inaudible.]—refinery when it produces 90 per cent—
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Ash Regan
Can I follow up on that, convener?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Ash Regan
Good morning. I want to follow on from Gordon MacDonald’s question. The figures for 2022-23 show that the revenue from Scotland’s oil and gas activity was £10.6 billion, which was a record amount. That £10.6 billion from Scotland’s oil and gas activity flowed into the UK Treasury. It has been reported that it would take an investment in Grangemouth of about £80 million to not only extend its life but make it profitable. That, ultimately, is what we are discussing this morning. Does the UK Government not understand that, in that context, the people of Scotland would reasonably expect a share of the revenue that comes from oil and gas to be invested back into Scotland’s infrastructure?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Ash Regan
Good afternoon to the panel members. I would like to pick up on Ms Medhurst’s response to Sharon Dowey earlier, in which she made comments along the lines of women prisoners being kind and tolerant. I consider that to be irrelevant to the policy making with regard to women prisoners’ safety. Why does the policy prioritise the feelings of trans-identified males over the safety of women prisoners?
14:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Ash Regan
It does do that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Ash Regan
I have no relevant interests to declare.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Ash Regan
It has taken five years to develop the revised policy. The revision was to correct a serious misjudgment, in that the previous policy did not consider the impact on women. That has been admitted. The Scottish Government and the SPS have taken five years to make the same mistake again—if we accept from the conversation that we have just had that they are not undertaking to consider fully the impact on women and their safety from psychological trauma and physical trauma, for example. Why, five years later, have we got to this position, where it seems that the Scottish Government is making the same mistake again?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Ash Regan
I would like to move on to the policy underpinnings. It seems that the policy has been based on the Yogyakarta principles, which are merely opinion, I would say. They do not have status in international law and they do not have any legal standing. Would you not say that it seems to be a bit disturbing to base an important prisons policy about protecting people on those principles and not on things such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Istanbul convention or the Bangkok rules. I would say that it is a serious omission that those international obligations do not seem to be referenced or referred to in the policy. Why are the SPS and the Scottish Government ignoring their international obligations in this matter?