Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 309 contributions

|

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

Can you give an example of positive benefits that have come from that implementation?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

Good morning. I want to move on and ask you for your thoughts on scrutiny and accountability with regard to your office. As you will be aware, that was quite a strong theme that came through in the finance committee’s inquiry, and that committee definitely had concerns about the level of scrutiny and whether it was appropriate. In your response, you have laid out the scrutiny and accountability measures that your office is subject to, but can you explain whether you consider them to be adequate? Can you suggest anything that would enhance that scrutiny and accountability?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

I know.

I will move on. You mentioned the Auditor General’s section 22 report and said that it rightly shone a light on the levels of scrutiny. Have all the changes that were suggested now been implemented in full?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

Thank you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

Good morning. I want to ask about the scrutiny and accountability functions. You will know that in its report the Finance and Public Administration Committee expressed what it is fair to say were quite serious concerns about levels of scrutiny and accountability across the whole piece—not specifically in relation to the Standards Commission, but everywhere.

In your response to the committee’s call for views you said that levels are “adequate”. I put a question about that to Mr Bruce, earlier. I have reflected that “adequate” is probably quite a low bar in that regard. Could more be done? Can you suggest additional ways in which scrutiny could be enhanced to benefit both the service and the impact on the public?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

So, in summary, that is about better questions from the committee, then?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

You have intimated that the report led to a positive benefit. Could you give us an example of that?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Ash Regan

I agree. Can you confirm to the committee that the governance changes that were suggested in the Auditor General’s section 22 report have been implemented in full?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

Interests

Meeting date: 12 December 2024

Ash Regan

Good morning. I have no relevant interests to declare.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Gender Identity Services for Children and Young People

Meeting date: 7 May 2024

Ash Regan

Good morning, Dr Cass. I want to pick up on a couple of areas that have already been discussed. The first is about the cohort of patients. The data shows a huge and quick increase in birth-registered females, the majority of whom are same-sex attracted. That is a very different cohort from the one that was considered in the earlier studies. Also, the new cohort’s presentation is much more complex. You have suggested that care should routinely include, for instance, screening for neurodevelopmental conditions. Will you tell us a little bit more about the change in the cohort, the extent to which treatments had been based on the previous one, and the potential risks around that?