The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 309 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ash Regan
A number of the commissioners who have come before the committee have said that they feel that the timing of their financial reporting to the Parliament is off, and they suggested that that could be improved. I am interested to know whether you had noticed that, too.
Secondly, do you think that there are strong enough links between the bodies’ financial reporting and, again, the outcomes that they are supposed to be achieving?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Ash Regan
I do not want to put words in your mouth—I am trying to summarise what you have just said—but do you think that there is a gap in that respect, that the Parliament should be looking at?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
My question is not about the individual case—it is about the wider issues.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
Forgive me for interrupting, but I have set out a number of issues. There are many people across Scotland who genuinely feel that women’s human rights are under attack right now across several of those issues, and across other issues that I have not set out. However, I genuinely feel that I am not hearing from the commission on either side of those issues. One way or another, we are not hearing from you, and you are not making interventions on those matters. Do you agree?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
Yes. Professor O’Hagan, you have set out that there are different scrutiny mechanisms that work together and through which you are accountable. Can you suggest any ways in which your accountability could be improved or other areas that you think could be made more robust?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
But CEDAW is within your remit—
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
Good morning. The committee is interested in the ideas of accountability and scrutiny, and whether you think that those are robust. The Scottish Human Rights Commission was set up by the Parliament to uphold human rights and to ensure that policy meets human rights requirements.
Last week, the EHRC intervened in the wake of the case involving Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife, but I note that we have not heard from you on that case or on single-sex spaces, nor have we heard from you on toilets in schools, the British Transport Police’s intimate search policy or Police Scotland’s policies on sex and gender. I argue that women’s human rights are very much affected by those issues. How, therefore, are you accountable to the Parliament and to the people of Scotland if you are failing to uphold the standards that provide the very reason for your existence?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
With regard to upholding women’s rights across Scotland, do you agree with John Swinney that trans women are women—in relation to the points of policy that I have raised—or do you agree with Reem Alsalem that, when it comes to single-sex spaces, sex means sex?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
And the Istanbul convention is within your remit.