The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 749 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
We probably need a national welding academy, given everything that we need to do.
I have a final question. I hear loud and clear the concerns about removing SAAB. It is not just about having employer or industry engagement at that level; it is about having that engagement when structures are formed. The recommendation has been made in an attempt to simplify the system—that is what it has been sold as—but, although the funding would be simplified by being put in one place, SDS will continue to exist, the career services collaborative has been created, and there will be regional skills planning through the regional economic partnerships that are emerging. If we are not careful, are we in danger of making the system more complicated rather than less complicated? There will certainly be more bodies at the end of this process than there were at the beginning.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you, convener. I want to begin by ensuring that I have heard witnesses correctly. Damien, we heard you say that it has been a difficult period of uncertainty for staff. Frank, we heard you say that there is a concern that we might not be moving at the required pace to capitalise on opportunities. Is that a correct understanding of your assessment of where you are? Critically, based on what the Government has brought forward, is it clear what SDS’s role will be in the future?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
That is helpful.
On making the changes and seizing opportunities, you have painted a vivid picture of those opportunities, the scale of the investment, what that will look like and even who we should perhaps seek to attract. You have talked about women and older workers in the workplace. What steps could and should we take now to deliver this? What is in the art of the possible if we move at pace with the machinery and levers that we have in front of us here and now?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will ask you what that will look like but, before I do, I have a follow-up question. Do you, as chair—or Damien, as chief executive—have clarity about what the functional footprint of SDS will be following the passage of the bill? What interfaces will you have with other agencies, or is that yet to be confirmed?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
There is a risk that, if we go at that sort of pace, it will be children who are starting in primary 1 now who are likely to be the first to see the benefits.
Is there also a risk when it comes to focus? The bits of your report that I really like are the bits on skills passporting, flexibility and benchmarking against the SCQF to get parity of esteem. That is all the good stuff, but we have not had any detail from the Government; in fact, we have not even had a road map. Given that, whatever we do, it will take some time even if we would like it to go more quickly, is there not a real risk in the Government not setting out what it believes are its priorities and direction of travel and the broad timeframes for implementing change? Essentially, all that the Government has done is introduce a bill that would merge the funding mechanisms.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
It is not about granular detail; it is about a broad sense of what the priorities are, what we are aiming towards and over what timeframe that will be achieved. That would be helpful, and I have shared that point directly with Graeme Dey.
I think that one of the real priorities is upskilling and reskilling. We have an ageing workforce. Because of demographics, we now have almost an inverse pyramid, so essentially we have to focus on older people. However, we still have a focus on skills being about young people leaving school. We have explicit funding thresholds based on age and a focus on apprenticeships, but older workers might not need to do a whole new apprenticeship and, even if they do, people cannot do more than one apprenticeship in their career. Are we missing that part of the agenda?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a couple of questions about pace and focus but, before that, I want to follow on from Willie Coffey’s question. You are right about the importance of colleges, and you posed a question about focus and what we are measuring. A fear has been articulated to me that we are measuring colleges on their ability to produce university graduates. As part of the culture shift, do we need to question that and think about whether colleges are producing vocational qualifications, and perhaps revisit the move away from part-time courses at colleges?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thanks very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Daniel Johnson
What is preventing that from happening? Is it just the college funding model aspects that we have rehearsed and which I get? How do we deliver that?