The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 757 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
Does Eileen Rowand want to add anything?
10:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
Does Eileen Rowand have any final comments before I hand over to colleagues?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
That link between the planning system and productivity in the economy is often overlooked.
After making that comment, I should probably advise members that my wife is a planning lawyer. That does not prevent me from railing against the planning system when I am at home.
I just did a quick word count of the resource spending review framework document, and I was surprised to find that “jobs” appears only once, “employment” appears only twice and “productivity” appears only once. Do witnesses agree that the framework and, once it is produced, the review should probably feature those words a few more times than that? It is a slightly flippant question but I want to put it to you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
Some of the responses to the consultation identify another aspect, which is how well money is spent. Is another element the principles by which the decision making is carried out? “Subsidiarity” is a bit of an obscure word, but do you think that at least some consideration should be given to ensuring that decision making happens as close as possible to the point at which it takes effect? Would COSLA like to see that being taken into account in the review?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
I will move on to the Scottish Property Federation’s submission. As a former retailer, I was pleased that the federation highlighted the issues that that industry faces. The specific point is that we cannot rely on non-domestic rates, but there is a broader point, which is that the framework document treats resource funding as fixed and uncontrollable. To my mind, there is insufficient examination of what things the Government can control to increase its revenue. The primary one is income tax.
That problem is set to increase, as set out in the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s forecast. Does the Scottish Property Federation have thoughts about what sorts of things need to be included? What levers and dynamics are at play in the economy that the review should take into account?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
I will ask each of you a question. I will begin with Alastair Sim, and I will pick up from where Liz Smith left off.
In your submission, you state that, since 2014-15, the teaching grant has declined by 13 per cent. Will you bring to life for us the practical impacts of that? I think that your submission is saying that that slow decline cannot carry on. If we are sitting here in five years, and that trend has straight lined, what will be the consequences for higher education as a sector and for individual institutions?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
I will ask a direct follow-up question to that. Obviously, institutions cannot charge fees for tuition but will that lead to a situation in which they charge fees for things for which they can? For example, will they increase accommodation fees or fees for access to other things on campus that are not tuition?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Daniel Johnson
Finally, I come to you, Mr Bradley. I was listening to your interaction with the convener, and it struck me that we continue to talk about the budget and the voluntary sector as though it is just that—a sector that is made up of volunteers doing nice extra things. Do we need to have a proper discussion about that and reassess it? I do not think that that is the nature of most of the organisations that we are talking about. We are talking about independent, not-for-profit, service providers. They are staffed by professionals, and the services that they deliver are delivered by professionals. Indeed, for a significant number, that is all or the majority of what they do. Essentially, they deliver services on behalf of the public sector.
Is that a fair reflection? Do we need to have a grown-up conversation about the relationship between the voluntary sector and the state?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Daniel Johnson
In the convener’s constituency, the Ardeer project, which involves nuclear fusion, is part of the North Ayrshire bid. That has energy security implications and potentially much wider externalities, but that does not seem to be captured in the current methodology. Might those sorts of things be considered in future funding rounds?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Daniel Johnson
That is very helpful.
I have a final question. The common thread through my questions is that productivity and ensuring quality are big complicated issues that cost money. The levelling up fund is worth £800 million in Scotland over the coming years, but that is set against a Scottish economy that is worth about £150 billion—give or take—a year. At a system level, what do you expect the outcomes to be, in financial terms or using other measures, from the levelling up fund?