The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 749 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
I accept that there may not be an answer to this, and I accept that tracking delivery against what was promised is important at project level, but what I am asking is slightly different. Can we demonstrate at that aggregate level that the growth deal structures are delivering additional value over and above just being a mechanism for delivering projects? That is probably too esoteric a question. If we are saying that this is a good vehicle for delivering projects, it is interesting to ask whether we can demonstrate that and measure that benefit.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am mindful that Ivan McKee is eagerly waiting to talk about moveable transactions, so I will attempt to keep this as brief as possible, although I do not have a great track record on that count.
I want to come back to some of the things that Murdo Fraser asked about, which also relate to what Colin Smyth said. You said that you do not think that it would be appropriate to copy and paste structures from England. However, if you look at the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, and if you remove firefighters from its headcount, it employs only around 500 people, covering quite a broad scope of different functions, including economic development, skills and education, and elements of public health. That is less than half of the headcount at Scottish Enterprise. It is quite a lightweight structure.
In Scotland, is there an overfocus on the mayor and an underfocus on the fact that it is a combined authority whose members are the constituent local authorities, which gives you one place to go and talk? I hear what you are saying about regional economic partnerships, but right now, in Scotland, at a regional level, we have quite a number of different places where you could go to talk. It could be the growth deal partners, it could be the regional economic partnership, or it could even be the health board, depending on what you want to do. What we do not have is one place where you can talk to your local authorities. Should you be looking at that and thinking about replicating that function? It is not about the structure; it is about the function.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
Although an announcement has been made about the development in Oxford, that is not in place of the exascale computer in Edinburgh, which is still under consideration. Given that the Deputy First Minister is taking such a keen interest in the issue, has she had dialogue and discussions on the importance of the exascale computer and, more broadly, the spending review?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
I accept that, but are there metrics nonetheless, albeit that they will not capture everything?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Daniel Johnson
And in agreement with Murdo Fraser as well, I think.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have some questions about the Registers of Scotland (Fees and Plain Copies) Miscellaneous Amendments Order 2025. I thank Murdo Fraser, because the flock of sheep serves as a useful example. For a shepherd who wants to borrow against a flock of sheep, not only does registering need to be cost effective but—critically—so does updating the register in order to maintain accurate and current information on the asset that has been borrowed against.
I want to ask about the schedule of charges. You set out in your submission that, following consultation, you reduced the registration fee from £80 to £30. How was the level of £30 arrived at? Does the Government feel that that is the right level, given that the Law Society of Scotland, in its submission, points out that registration fees are considerably lower in other jurisdictions? The Law Society offers the examples of Australia and New Zealand, where the registration fee is about £7, while comparable situations, such as registering mortgages, or registering a company with Companies House, are charged at £15.
Although I understand that £30 is not an astronomical amount of money, it is still more than those sums. How was it arrived at, and what is the Government’s view on what the level of fee does with regard to ensuring that an accurate register is maintained?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
I was not asking about individuals.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
For free?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
Is a review and assessment of the fee structure programmed in once the new measures are up and running?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
My understanding is that that is what was discussed as the bill was progressing through the Parliament.