The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 757 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
That would be helpful. Certainly in a previous life, I was used to a utilisation rate of between 60 and 80 per cent. It would be interesting and useful to know what parameters you are using.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
Okay. Thank you very much. [Interruption.] I obviously have the chair looking at that now; I am finished, chair.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
I have probably used up more than my time, but I will ask one very blunt, bottom-line question. The overall budget request of £34.9 million represents a 4.8 per cent increase on your previous year’s budget. That 4.8 per cent seems incredibly close to the gross domestic product deflator of 4.8 per cent for the coming financial year. I want to understand whether that was your starting point or is it a bottom-up? I hope you do not mind my asking this question. I am sure that auditors would agree with me that you should always take a closer look at coincidences when they occur and when numbers seem to match each other.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
I have just one final question and I am afraid that it is a bit of a cheeky one, to be honest. I could not help but note on page 22 what looks awfully like a rate card to me. What is your target number of chargeable hours per year for a chargeable person, for a whole-time equivalent? I know that, even if it is not expressed in those terms, that issue will be at the forefront of your minds when you are constructing rate cards.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
My question is not about individual firms and your comparison to them, but to the profession as a whole. Given that it is a regulated profession and that there are industry bodies, I assume that industry-wide salary surveys are carried out. Do you use those and do you undertake a formal benchmarking process? If so, could you set out how that operates?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
There are obviously benchmarks. I could not find the most recent figures, but the previous year that Hays produced was, I think, 3 per cent. It would be useful to understand where Audit Scotland stands on that and, indeed, your rationale for when you step away, which is ultimately the purpose of a benchmarking exercise.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
If you have been running at 6 per cent, is 2 per cent a safe assumption?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
I could ask more questions about the assumptions and your people budget line, but in the interests of time I will move on.
Given that the question of a contingency has been raised, can I ask you for some further details about how the £500,000 figure—that is not an exact quote—has been arrived at? Is that derived from your risk register? If not, what is the methodology for how it is arrived at? What proportion of the contingency is ascribed to the potential risks around salary costs and salary increases?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
With the revised standards, it takes more effort to get to that point for colleges than it does for other bodies. Fundamentally, is that what you are saying? That then reflects the bids that you get from the private sector. Is that the fundamental driver?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Daniel Johnson
Yes. Are you able to share with the commission in writing the standards that have driven the increase? I will not ask you to enumerate them now.