The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 757 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
Can you elaborate on that and give some examples of the sort of bureaucracy that you had to go through? What was the source? Did it come from the UK Government or the Scottish Government? I understand your point about volume, but did it make sense or was it a frustration?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
Unless Anne Murray or Malcolm Benny wants to raise anything, I will leave it there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
The person from broadcasting is looking somewhat twitchy. I think that you might have a mobile device near the microphone that is causing a bit of buzz. That is much better—thank you. [Interruption.] Oh no—it is still there. Maybe it is me.
You said that the primary focus is on the business case requirements. Is the issue the fact that there is a significant number of requirements, or is it their inflexibility? Are the requirements relatively well articulated, or is it a more informal process of querying? Is the process burdensome but clear, or is it a burden because it is not clear? That is really what I am asking.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I ask David McDowall and Rick O’Farrell whether there is anything that they want to add. I will not repeat the whole question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I also welcome our witnesses. Just to give you fair warning, given that there are a lot of us on the committee and a lot of you on the panel, whoever flinches first is who I will direct my question to, so I will be watching very intently how you react.
In broad terms, we are interested in how city region deals work in the broader policy context, how they have been constructed, how they are overseen and what effect they have. Given that you represent some of the more recent deals, I begin by asking you all to what degree you have benefited from the experience of the previous growth deals, and how that informed the way that your deal was constructed and put together. Anne Murray, you were nodding, so I am afraid I come to you first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I am quite interested in that. You mentioned benefits realisation and the PMO, which relate to the organisation of and mechanisms for the growth deals themselves. Is that primarily where the benefits were focused? I am also interested in how projects were identified and put together and how they fit together overall. Were the methodologies and processes for identifying projects shared?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I just threw that question out there.
Malcolm Bennie, you are looking at me attentively, so I have a similar question for you. What benefit did you receive from previous growth deals as you framed, constructed and set up your deal?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
I am interested in how city region deals sit within a broader policy framework. I will probably keep this to two questions, but I will put a slightly different spin on them for different respondents.
In a previous answer, Paul Lawrence alluded to the fact that city region deals were in some ways designed for combined authorities south of the border, and it has been suggested that some of the issues that have been encountered may be due to that. Will you elaborate a little on that? What issues have been encountered? Are there things that could be altered to make the deals more compatible with Scotland, or is it actually the other way round? Should we recognise that combined authorities afford possibilities that we cannot access because we do not have that structure?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
That is a really useful elaboration of the difference.
I will put the question to colleagues from Glasgow in a slightly different way. In many ways, Glasgow is much further forward on the journey to having a coherent approach to regional governance, with the Glasgow city region. Do you consider lessons that have been learned from the city region? Is exploring that critical to delivering on the opportunities? I direct those questions primarily to Owen O’Donnell, because I think that some of the fears, as it were, about such an approach come from smaller authorities, so I am particularly interested in hearing his views.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. Convener, I think that we are running out of time, so I will leave it there.