The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 749 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
It was more broadly about whether there is more than one way to skin a cat. We are using secondary legislation to update things, but are there other ways of doing that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am smiling, because that is what the Government likes to say. However, when you look you will see that most weeks we are not legislating. In fact, if we were to have a stage 3 once a month, we would say that that was quite frequent. I think that the Parliament has scope to do more legislating, if it wanted to. In theory, it is an interesting point, but the situation is not the same in the Scottish Parliament as it is at Westminster.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
It must be bad, then.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
Ms Crichton, did you want to comment?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
My substantive line of questioning, which was on practical suggestions that you might have, has, I think, largely been dealt with by others, certainly with regard to amending and other such matters. However, I was interested in the Law Society’s evidence, which makes a number of recommendations on framework legislation, including on provision of enhanced supplementary material, enhanced consultation and the possibility of legislation being amended.
In that respect, I have two questions. First, are you suggesting, essentially, that we should have a different process for framework bills in order to cover those things? I also noticed that the submission suggested—as you have, Michael—that draft regulations could be put alongside such bills to give greater clarity.
Is that about having a different process for framework legislation? If so, should that process also apply to secondary powers, such as those that might not be in full-blown framework legislation, but which have some of those characteristics? Is the implication that there should be some sort of sifting mechanism to decide when such a process should be employed?
12:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
You are such an optimist—it is heartening. [Laughter.]
Ms Springham and Ms Crichton, do you have thoughts about enhanced material or other things that should be requested along with a framework bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will push Jonnie Hall and Lloyd Austin on a couple of the points that they raised.
I understand the point about flexibility, but you have discussed the need for consultation and scrutiny. When powers are delivered through secondary legislation, there is actually less of a requirement. Parliament has very clear rules: our three-stage process is clearly laid out and is open, allowing people make submissions. However, there is no pre-configured format for what consultation the Government might require for legislation—sometimes, it is not specified at all. If you want scrutiny and consultation, would you not be better off with primary legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
You mentioned guidance and parliamentary scrutiny, earlier. Bills might specify that guidance needs to be laid before Parliament but, in essence, that is a notice period before the guidance is introduced. That process does not actually require any input, and there is no ability for Parliament to amend or update the guidance, although committees could take evidence, if they want to. Are you suggesting that some thought should be given to a parliamentary role in relation to guidance, particularly when it relates to a substantial matter?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
Rosemary Agnew, I was interested in some of your previous answers. What you said was similar to some things that were said last week about there not necessarily being a hard and fast distinction between framework bills and non-framework bills, and the idea that the issue is more about how powers that are delivered through secondary legislation are framed and structured. You can have very broad and open powers and other powers that are very well specified. The broad parameters are set, but the issue is the detail or the levels that are left to secondary legislation.
Does that need to be an area of greater focus, so that we have models for framing secondary powers? Most legislation will involve some secondary powers—it is very rare for legislation to have none. Are you suggesting that we think about how secondary powers are framed and structured, rather than focus purely on whether a bill is a framework bill or not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Daniel Johnson
Oh, no—sorry. Apologies. I am comparing 2023-24 with the budget for 2024-25.