The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 732 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Ruth Maguire
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Ruth Maguire
Good morning, minister. As you say, the bill is about advancing children’s rights, and I would like to cover some areas where concerns have been raised in that regard. On compulsory supervision orders, concerns have been raised with us that the imposition of movement restriction conditions could amount to the deprivation of liberty of a child or young person, without legal safeguards. Have you considered whether more needs to be done with regard to access to legal representation for young people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
That is helpful. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
If that would be acceptable, yes, I do.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
Children’s Hearings Scotland had raised that point in relation to children’s rights to privacy.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
Does SWS have an opinion on the fact that some of the conditions mean that the focus might be on the child keeping away from harmful people or places rather than on us doing something about harmful people and places?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
If that support goes with it, is that where the greatest opportunity to be helpful to children lies?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
Is that element of the safety of the victim covered in existing guidance for practitioners and professionals?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
I am skipping the queue—thank you, convener, and apologies to other committee members.
We have heard some concerns that compulsory supervision orders might not attract the same safeguards—the obvious one is the entitlement to legal representation—against depriving children of their liberty. I noted that Children’s Hearings Scotland had some concerns about the methods for tracking people, which the Information Commissioner might share in terms of the right to privacy.
I am keen to hear reflections on that point so that we can get on record what the concerns are about that. Does Jenny Brotchie want to go first?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2023
Ruth Maguire
I would like some clarification from Stephen Bermingham. You said that we could not tell a victim details of a compulsory supervision order, which I absolutely appreciate. You will all have real-life examples of where harm has been done and there is a victim. In terms of the victim’s safety planning, you said that there could be informal ways that children and their families might be able to understand—I will just say it bluntly—that they would be safe and they would not encounter the person who had harmed them in certain areas. Is that the sort of thing that you mean, whereby their victims could be partially informed without getting the details of the individuals? Does that make sense?