The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1019 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
It is not so much a supplementary as a different question. When I was looking through our briefing papers, I felt that this was probably the best place to bring it in. If you can bear with me, I am happy to bring it in now or at the end—at your discretion, convener.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
I guess that you are saying that we will need to see how the levy works in the fullness of time. I understand that; I am asking questions when we do not know how things will work out.
More broadly, I am pointing out that Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen and some of the other council areas that have been mentioned and are represented here today, are able to introduce visitor levy schemes that raise significant sums of money, which can be reinvested in local services. There are other council areas, however, where the tourism infrastructure, particularly for overnight stays, just is not there to the same extent and they could not generate the same money to put back into services. At the end of the financial year, there would be a disparity. Would the Scottish Government need to be involved in levelling the playing field, if you like, for want of a better expression?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Okay, thanks, convener. My question is probably best directed to Gareth Dixon. It might not be fair for the other witnesses to answer it. If the amendment bill passes and the visitor levy is introduced, do you see any situation in which certain local authorities might be financially disadvantaged by a levy?
In local authorities such as Edinburgh and Glasgow, for example, we can see the huge appeal of such a levy, but if other local authorities, such as my own in North Lanarkshire, decide to bring it in or not to bring it in, could there be any financial disadvantage for them? How could that be remedied by the Government in the amendment bill?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you; that is useful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. I will stay on the same theme. What scope is there to offer local authorities multi-year spending plans in order to support the delivery of net zero policies?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
The issue was covered, thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
There are not very many Fultons in the world, convener, so let me just tell you that I have been called Fulton Mackay far too many times for me to count. It is a very common thing that I have experienced.
Good morning—it is still morning. I have a couple of questions on cladding, cabinet secretary. In the interests of time, I will ask them together. How confident are you that the £52 million allocated for cladding remediation in 2025-26 will be spent, given that just £2.4 million had been spent by 30 November 2025? How will any underspend this year impact progress on future spending?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Can you hear me now?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you for that clarification, cabinet secretary.
Do you have any plans to use finance and workforce planning levers to support dedicated multidisciplinary net zero teams within local government?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Thanks for that clarification.
I have a final question, convener, if that is okay. The evidence stresses the fact that local authorities sit almost at the intersection of housing, transport, planning, public health and so on. How can you further ensure that local government finance settlements support integrated place-based programmes, rather than siloed funding by portfolio?