The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 984 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I thank the witnesses for their evidence so far. Quite a few of the issues that I was going to raise have already been covered, but I want to raise some of the concerns that we have heard from people who are currently involved in the sex trade. Sharon Dowey explored with you, and you brought up in your opening remarks, the issue about choice—people who choose to do it—and necessity. Does the bill take that into account? From the evidence that we have taken, we can almost distinguish between people who choose and make a decision to do it—who say that it is a good move for them—and those who are forced into it. If the bill were passed, what would be the implications for those who make that choice?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
You heard the minister say last week that the Government is generally supportive of the general aims of the bill and what you are trying to achieve, but that it feels that this is a big and complex issue, with various different moving parts. What do you think of the notion that your bill is perhaps not the right place to do this just now but that a bigger piece of work needs to be done in the next parliamentary session to marry up all the different strands? Do you have a thought on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
We also heard that people who are currently involved often feel that services—whether that be police, social work or health services—treat them pretty badly. They almost feel subhuman at times. From our evidence, there is a fear, as other members have expressed, that that situation would become worse if the bill was passed. What are your thoughts on that? Is there any evidence from other countries that would either back that up or disprove it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. I think that I have spoken to most committee members already, but I apologise again for having had to move and join the meeting remotely.
Katy Clark started to explore this matter in relation to the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service. You probably saw last week’s evidence session, when the SFRS advised the committee that it had made a business case to expand the firefighter role, but that had not been funded by the Scottish Government. I think that there was an agreement that you were keen to look at that. Why was that decision made, and could it be reconsidered, given the persuasive case that the SFRS made for the expansion of the role?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I agree with you on that. I probably speak for my colleagues when I say that we are beginning to get a lot more constituent queries that are AI generated. As you said, they are just as relevant as if they had not been done with AI, because they are still constituents’ queries.
I have another quick question, which relates to one of the convener’s earlier ones. The convener asked about the committee’s request last year about gathering information relating to the sex or gender of complainers. I want to ask a wee bit more about that.
When you are looking at complaints—say, for example, there is one about councillor-on-councillor conduct—are you looking at whether patterns are emerging? For example, would you look at whether a councillor who is male is targeting female councillors in particular? Members of the Scottish Parliament know—and I am sure that you are aware, too—that politics is a difficult place for women. From having spoken to councillors in the past, I know that they feel that it can be a difficult environment. Do you and your team consider that when complaints come in and do you make assessments? Do you take quite a strict X, Y and Z approach or is that issue in your mind?
10:00Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you, convener. Good morning, Ian. My first question is about the super-complaint that you referenced in the annual report and in your opening statement. Obviously, you cannot give any personal information about it, but can you tell us a bit more about the super-complaint? What was the nature of it and what issues were involved?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
What else would count as a super-complaint? That was a pretty good example, and I can see how it would come about. Should a flurry of complaints about, say, an individual councillor count, or would they be treated individually?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
That brings me to my next question on the super-complaint, which is about the resource implications for your office. Are you saying that the resource implications for that particular super-complaint were not overly onerous?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
You have already said that the majority of complaints received in 2024-25 were from members of the public. How many of those were admissible? Do you feel that there is perhaps a lack of knowledge or understanding among the public about the role and scope of the code?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thanks, convener.