The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1008 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
That is an understandable answer, cabinet secretary. I will bring my final couple of questions together, if that is okay, but if you need me to come back in to clarify anything, that is okay, too. That might be easier, as I am online. How will the recommendations in the green heat task force’s second report be prioritised, and will a range of funding solutions be mobilised quickly? What are the implications if alternative funding solutions do not materialise as you anticipate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning and thank you for the evidence so far. As the convener said, I am going to ask a couple of questions on cost and finance.
The first report of the green heat taskforce was published in 2021 and the second in April 2025. However, as the committee has heard, there was little detail about the costs associated with specific policies and proposals. Will the final plan give more information on the anticipated costings?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Yes, absolutely.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
My next question is about the intelligence that the police hold—the information on various lists, MAPPA and other systems. You have touched on that. Have you had conversations with Police Scotland about the intelligence that it holds, how that is used and how it is distributed to other agencies when that is appropriate?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you for that answer, but my question was more about the fact that the police already identify high-risk offenders. How does your bill differ from that and how would it change the situation? Did you introduce the bill because you do not know what information the police hold?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
The notification and monitoring system that is proposed in your bill mirrors the one that is in place for sexual offenders. I can understand the principle behind that and, when you first raised it in the Parliament a number of years ago, I remember thinking that I could understand where you were going with it.
However, the committee has heard quite a few concerns about that as we have taken evidence. I will go through them. The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association told us that
“the parallel with sexual offences is limited”,
Police Scotland stated that the tactical benefits from notification
“are more limited in domestic abuse cases than in the case of a sex offender”
and Scottish Women’s Aid told us that MAPPA
“was never designed to work for domestic abuse”.
What is your response to that pretty strong evidence? As others said earlier, we have heard strong evidence against the main proposal in that area.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. Police Scotland already identifies high-risk domestic abuse offenders and gathers and holds intelligence on those individuals. I know that you made an opening statement, but can you say a bit more about how the requirements of the bill that you are progressing would be different from the notification requirement system that is already used by the police?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. I have a few questions that are scattered about a wee bit, so I ask you to bear with me.
For the first couple of questions, I am going to put on my old criminal justice social work hat. I want to ask about the use of community payback orders and whether you think that there is more that we can do with those in this area. Social Work Scotland told the committee that an alternative to implementing the notification requirement could be to include something in the community payback order.
Community payback orders are designed to be quite broad. Could we make more use of those to capture some of the aims of the bill? Does the Government have any thoughts about that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I probably did not ask the question very well. I was not talking about specific programmes such as the Caledonian programme, which can be part of a community payback order. It was more about whether, as an alternative to implementing a notification requirement, something that mirrored that requirement could be included in a community payback order. CPOs are broad, and I am sure that such a requirement could be included; perhaps some sheriffs are doing that. However, I think that what Social Work Scotland was getting at when it spoke to the committee was that something more standardised and more regular could be useful.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
That is good. Moving on, I want to come in on the back of an earlier line of questioning from Jamie Hepburn on the Caledonian system, which we have just spoken about. Does the Government have any data about where the Caledonian system has been used in relation to courts making decisions, as opposed to where that approach is not used? Does it have any data to suggest that the Caledonian project has given courts confidence in the areas where it is in place, as opposed to those areas where it is yet to be put in place?