The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 884 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
That was helpful. It seems that almost everybody wants to come in on this question, so I will just move along the panel. Obviously, please keep your comments to something new that has not already been said.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning—just, by four minutes. Thank you for your evidence so far.
One of the themes of the committee’s stage 1 scrutiny was awareness and understanding of the legislation on private rented housing. I have a general question. Is the proposed new system easy for tenants and landlords to understand?
If you were in the room during the previous panel, you will have heard me ask those witnesses the same question. To summarise their response, it was pretty much unanimous that the new system was difficult to understand, but there was also a strong view that that should not necessarily delay things moving forward—it is about supporting and helping people to understand it. Does anyone have thoughts on that? You can tie that in to what the previous panel said if you heard it.
I will not try to do what I did the last time and ask everybody to speak. I pass back to the convener to chair who wants to come in, given the time constraints.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I have a very general question. You will be aware that, during the committee’s stage 1 scrutiny, concerns were raised about the public’s awareness and understanding of the legislation on private rented housing. Is the new proposed system for tenants and landlords easy to understand? I accept that that is a broad question, and I apologise if you have already touched on it, particularly before I arrived.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I apologise that I missed the first part of the meeting. I was at the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, which was discussing a petition in which I have had a long-running interest. I mention that because I am running the risk that you have already answered or touched on the question that I am going to ask. If that is the case, please just tell me.
I go back to the provisions that are temporary and that the Government is looking to be made permanent. One third of those relate to higher fiscal fines, with a maximum of £500, rather than the pre-Covid £300 maximum. In principle, is the offering of fiscal fines an appropriate option? If so, in what types of cases should they be used? Are there are cases in which they should not be used at all? I am quite happy with whoever wants to answer that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
My follow-up question probably goes where you were going with that. Have you seen any examples of fiscal fines of up to £500 being used inappropriately? Have you come across that in your practice and can you comment on it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you; that is helpful. Stuart Munro or Paul Smith, do you have anything to add?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I will just come right out and ask the question: in your view, should the current temporary measure be made permanent?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I think that you are both saying that it is important that people have a choice—an informed choice—about which option is best for them.
I have one further question, on the first area in which the bill proposes to move from temporary to permanent provisions: the electronic signing and transmission of legal documents in criminal cases. Do you regard those provisions as helpful, or are there situations in which it might be more helpful for the people with whom you work to do that using the old-fashioned paper method?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Before I move on to ask Adam Stachura about that, do you support the development of fully virtual trial courts to deal with some of the types of case that people who have come to you might have been involved in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
That is interesting—thank you.