The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 879 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I was going to come back to you to ask about the collaboration with local government. The Welsh Local Government Association submission described the changes leading up to 2005 as “intense”, so I thank you and your colleagues for expanding on that.
How would our Scottish colleagues describe the joint working group in Scotland? Do you believe that its work is similar to some of the collaborative work that has gone on in Wales, or is there more to be learned from that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. I will try to be quick.
I understand that it will be possible for review reports to be shared with families and for the recommendations that are contained in such reports to be published. How can the privacy of family members be protected in such situations, while ensuring that lessons are learned?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
As part of the process of learning lessons from reviews, responses or actions might be required on the part of specific service providers. Will extra funding be available to such providers, when that is appropriate and a request has been made?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I understand that it is hard to answer when I have not given a concrete example of a lesson learned and what the implications of that might be.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
The questions that I intended to ask were in a similar area to the one that Pauline McNeill asked about, and I think that most of them were covered in your exchanges with her.
However, there is still one aspect that I want to ask about. We understand that one potential use of the power to allow virtual attendance could be to allow, through a series of court decisions in individual cases, the operation of a virtual trial court for domestic abuse cases. Each case would need to be considered for inclusion on its own merits. Can you update us on any pilots on that, including the number of cases involved? Is there any risk that such an innovation would not gain traction if the parties could simply refuse to take part? Would there be anything to compel their involvement in such an initiative?
11:30Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I apologise that I am joining the meeting on my phone, which is why I am not using a camera. I apologise for the noise in the background, too—it is the school holidays here in North Lanarkshire this week.
I will keep my question succinct. It follows on from Sara Cowan’s last line. The Low Incomes Tax Reform Group has stated:
“Once there has been a full revaluation, other reforms could be approached in the knowledge that the tax base is accurate”.
Do witnesses have any thoughts on that? What further reforms do you think might be necessary?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning to both Fiona Drouet and Marsha Scott. I feel sorry for you, Fiona, as you are the only witness in the room, sitting on your own, but you are doing very well. Before I ask my question, I wonder whether you recall a film in which you participated: “Bruised” by Carla Basu. Carla is a constituent of mine, and we ran a screening of the film in the Parliament just a couple weeks ago. Rona Mackay was there, as was Audrey Nicoll, along with various other members from across the parties, including Government ministers. The event was really well attended, and I thought that your contribution to the film was extremely powerful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Dr Scott, do you have any views on that? Are they pretty similar?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
On a similar theme, with regard to multiple proceedings, the bill would allow reviews to be carried out in parallel with other proceedings, which would potentially include criminal proceedings. Of course, the Lord Advocate would have the power to pause or end the review to prevent any prejudice. What are your views on that, if you have any?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Katie, do you want to comment on that?