The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1019 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
That is good. Moving on, I want to come in on the back of an earlier line of questioning from Jamie Hepburn on the Caledonian system, which we have just spoken about. Does the Government have any data about where the Caledonian system has been used in relation to courts making decisions, as opposed to where that approach is not used? Does it have any data to suggest that the Caledonian project has given courts confidence in the areas where it is in place, as opposed to those areas where it is yet to be put in place?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you—that is a really positive answer.
It is stated in part 5 of the bill that the substantive provisions in the act, if it was passed, would come into force two months after it gained royal assent. What are your views on that timescale?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Yes. Do you have any views on that timescale?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
To finish that line of questioning, as the chair of the cross-party group on social work, I know that Social Work Scotland will be keen that I ask this: on the basis of what we have just spoken about, would the minister be happy to meet Social Work Scotland at some point to discuss that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. It has been an interesting session so far. As the convener highlighted, I know that you have touched on some of the issues that I am going to ask about, but I will ask my questions anyway.
Before I do so, I apologise to our witnesses for any background noise that they might hear—unfortunately, the sound of the washing machine is unavoidable from where I am sitting, and I am not sure whether you can hear it.
On the local heat and energy efficiency strategies, I know that, in their submissions, some local authorities expressed concerns about their capacity to deliver heat networks in particular. What progress have local authorities made on the development of the local heat networks, and what do you think is needed to drive those strategies forward?
As I am not in the room, I am quite happy to allow the convener to suggest who should answer.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Moving on, I am interested in how councils are improving energy efficiency and decarbonising their own stock. What are your views on the Scottish Government’s proposed target to decarbonise heating systems by 2045, and what local authorities can do to contribute to that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thanks for those responses. It is positive to hear that those complaints and suchlike are going down. Obviously there would have been a sort of teething period, so it is good to hear that. I know that the committee was quite concerned about that.
I will move on to my next question. Do you think that the draft plan says enough about how owner-occupiers can best be supported to transition to clean heating systems, what incentives do you think are needed and what role should regulation have in this? I am interested in your views on that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I realise that the time is quite tight, convener. Does the panel think that the draft plan is clear about the funding required to decarbonise buildings, that split between private and public finance, and how best limited resources should be targeted? There is quite a lot in that question, but I am putting it all together in the interest of time.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I thank the witnesses for their responses so far. I will follow on from my colleague’s line of questioning on a similar area.
I am interested in what you think can be done to improve individuals’ experience of obtaining publicly funded grants and loans for energy efficiency and clean heat. You will probably be aware that the committee has heard some evidence and lived experience that highlights that people often face difficulties in accessing grants. What are your views on that and how do you think the plan’s commitment to continue those schemes can have the most impact moving forward?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you, convener, and good morning. I must apologise to the panel and all committee members for not being there in person. I am still struggling a bit with a cold.
Like Jamie Hepburn, I, too, have had some contact from local fire officers, and I put on record my thanks to them for coming to me on this matter. A lot of the things that they raised with me have already been covered by other members, but I want to ask a wee bit about your views on the consultation on the review. I have heard some criticism that the review was not clear and concise enough for people to think through the actual implications of the changes and that there was not a great level of engagement with local organisations, businesses and community groups. In fact, a lot of the publicity in that respect came through the SFRS’s Facebook page and social media channels. Do you have any comments on those thoughts—or criticisms, if you like—that have been put to me?