Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 26 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 888 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Thank you. That point was very powerfully made.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Do you think that that could be brought out through the trauma-informed practice that is embedded in the legislation?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Good morning to the panel members. Thank you for your evidence so far. I have a couple of questions that broadly follow on from Paul O’Kane’s line of questioning. You are funded by the SPCB, and we know that the 2022-23 budget cut about 22 per cent from your budget of the previous year. Have you had any discussions or received any indications about why that cut was made? In addition to what you have already said, what has been the impact on your operational planning?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Sorry—I think I made the mistake of muting myself between questions. I did not realise that you now cannot unmute yourself—the system has totally changed.

Thank you for that answer, Jan. Let us move on to talk about your ambitions. I note that the second Scottish national action plan for human rights, which was published last year and runs to 2030, sets out 54 actions across eight priority areas. I will not go into what those are, but a couple of examples are in our papers, including the criminal justice system and the school education system. Based on what you said in response to the previous question and what you have said throughout the meeting, how realistic are the actions and how do you plan to measure them?

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Transgender Prisoners

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

My question is for Teresa Medhurst and relates to the briefing that Scottish Trans sent to committee members and, I am sure, other members. Scottish Trans is generally supportive of the policy, but it feels that, in one area, the policy will not achieve its aims, and that is in relation to non-binary people. The briefing says:

“This will result in some non-binary people being held in either the male or female estate when this is clearly inappropriate to their particular personal circumstances. We are concerned that SPS have not properly understood the range of ways in which non-binary people may transition.”

What are your views on what Scottish Trans has said? That is the only area that it has highlighted.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Thank you for your powerful evidence so far, including what you have just said.

I will ask about the same subject that I asked about in the previous evidence session—I do not know whether you saw it. What are your views on independent legal representation? What I am getting from your submission is that the Crown Office is generally supportive of the idea and the provisions for it, but that it envisages some problems. You have outlined some ways in which those problems might be resolved. Could you expand on that?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Good afternoon. I will stick to the line of questioning that I followed with the previous two panels of witnesses, which is on the issue of independent legal representation. Your submission is different to those of Lady Dorrian and the Lord Advocate, in that you raise concerns about the resource implications and the possibility of delays to cases. Can you expand on those concerns? Is there any merit to the suggestion and, if so, how could it be achieved, if not through the bill?

Criminal Justice Committee

Management of Sexual Offences Cases

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

Thank you. You have made a compelling case about how you and the review group came to your decision.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

I am not really asking you to develop the policy. You have been clear that you have issues with the proposals as they are set out, and I was asking whether you had any thoughts or suggestions as to how they could be rectified and how the policy might work better in practice. However, I accept your point that this will take further discussions.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 January 2024

Fulton MacGregor

My questioning so far, and in the earlier evidence session, has focused on independent legal representation in relation to the rape shield provisions—as Lady Dorrian said, she recommended ILR for that purpose only. What are your thoughts on independent legal representation being provided for complainers in a wider context, perhaps when they first make a complaint?

We have heard a lot of evidence—I am sure that you have heard it as well—that when somebody makes a complaint to the police in these situations, that is it for them until they are next contacted by the criminal justice system. Is there a role for the provision of independent legal advice at an earlier stage, so that somebody could go through with people making a complaint how things might pan out?