The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1931 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
That is the thing. As Fiona Leslie outlined in her earlier responses, some small landholders might have wanted to do that or, at least, would have liked it to be considered. Fiona took part in direct discussions with small landholders. In broad terms, that was the direction of travel that they wanted to go in. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I do not want to get into too much of a battle about wording at this stage of the meeting, convener. Different questions were posed, some of which related to specific proposals, and some witnesses welcomed the proposals but felt that they could be made stronger in some areas. From reading through all that evidence, I think that the responses were more nuanced, but we want to listen to those opinions and see where we can strengthen the proposals in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
It is helpful to have the work and the report of the Scottish Land Commission about further additions or changes that it thinks would strengthen the proposals that are in the bill. I welcome that.
The committee has undertaken a number of evidence sessions since the bill was published, and we have been listening to the various views that have been expressed throughout, as I have already stated this morning. We have listened, and we are actively considering the proposals that have been put forward by the Scottish Land Commission. We are looking forward to considering its recommendations alongside the recommendations that will come from the committee in its stage 1 report.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
We are considering that as well. I recognise that it came through quite strongly that going to the tenant farming commissioner to appoint a valuer should be the next option and not necessarily the place to start.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
As I said, work has been done on that and it will inform future guidance, which is the place to deal with that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
That is one of the things that would depend on individual circumstances and whether a tenant has been given rights by the landowner to control the deer.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
There are a number of factors. The matter was part of the consultation that was undertaken, and we have outlined some aspects in the policy memorandum.
In other countries, interventions or obligations after the point of sale, or obligations on potential buyers, tend to fall into a couple of areas. We think that there is an example of authorisation of buyers in Australia, but that is more about national security risks.
There are alternative purchase models. The Land Commission has done work on the SAFER model in France, for example, whereby a public body or an interim body would buy the land, and the owner of the land would be compelled to sell. The body would hold the land for an interim period before determining use of the land.
We have introduced the transfer test and the lotting procedures as we have because we could not identify an option that would allow lotting to be applied where the test was on the buyer. That is why lotting will apply before that point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
Andy, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I come back to why we set out the provision in the way that we have, which is to ensure that bodies that report breaches have some experience in relation to land management and working with communities on the ground. We also wanted to guard against, and deal with, the potential for vexatious complaints. That is why we set out the bodies for reporting breaches in the way that we have. However, I have heard the evidence that the committee received, particularly from the Crofting Commission and other bodies, about what people feel should be on the list. Again, I am open to hearing the committee’s recommendations on that, although we have a power to add bodies to the list if it were felt that more should be added.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
Again, I do not know whether you are talking about the valuation. Is that the specific point that you are getting at?