Seòmar agus comataidhean

I do not believe so, but I am happy to follow up with the committee in writing and to provide the information as to exactly how that £15 million has been split and where the changes in the budget lines would be, if that is helpful.

You are absolutely right. This has been a long on-going process. There are proposals relating to offshore MPAs as well as to inshore MPAs and priority marine features. I am sure that David Signorini will correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that the consultation is due to commence towards the end of this year. I think that that is the current timescale.

Absolutely. Within my broader portfolio, we can look at spending that will be relevant. I was asked a question earlier about funding for crofting, which is, of course, a vital and important spend for our island communities. We also have funding for the islands growth deal, which is developing and delivering some very important projects.

On wider spend across the piece, I come to the committee every year and talk about the national islands plan, which ultimately outlines and showcases how every portfolio is delivering for the islands against the strategic objectives that have been set out in the islands plan. It is not just funding through the islands programme that is relevant: various other funds are relevant—for example, housing, health and education funding—and will have an impact on our islands.

It is in the overall national islands plan and the report that we can do on that. Of course, addressing depopulation does not come down to just one specific intervention. You will see that spend right across portfolios in what we are doing in housing, skills, transport and other areas.

We will try to capture that within the addressing depopulation action plan, which will set out the different actions that we are taking across Government to address some of the challenges. I am afraid that I do not have a straightforward answer, because all portfolios have to work on it together. That is why the majority of portfolios are represented on the population task force—because it is within everyone’s interests and we all have a part to play in delivering on that. However, the detail will be in the document that we will publish.

No, in the overall settlement to the Scottish Government, the real-terms cut is 1.2 per cent .

Keeping it at the same level, though, is a real-terms cut.

First, I want to clarify that the funding for that does exist—we are continuing to fund the animal health and welfare plans, the carbon audits and the soil testing within the national test programme. Funding of £12 million has been allocated to that in the coming financial year.

It has been switched, yes.

Yes, you are absolutely right. I recognise how vital that support is, which is why we have maintained that funding during the current financial year.

No doubt, the committee will be aware of the information that we have published about the route map for future support. We continue to support LFA funding and will maintain our commitment to doing so until such time as we transition to new parts of the future framework.

I met the NFUS’s LFA committee just before the recess to hear its thoughts on future support. I understand from visiting farmers and crofters across the country the importance of LFASS and the support that we provide for that. Maintaining that funding has been a priority.

I am talking about pillar 1 other payments.