The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1931 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
That is an important point. As you said, the committee heard evidence, which I have considered, that some landowners are already undertaking such work. There are costs associated with that, as we have set out clearly in the documents that are associated with the bill. The issue is how we balance the requirements, which comes back to why we have brought forward the proposals in the way that we have. As you said, a lot of people are engaging in that work anyway, so I would not expect the costs for them to be considerably higher than they already are. That is within the ranges that we have set out in the accompanying documents.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
It might make sense for a land management plan to take into consideration work that is already being undertaken on an area’s overall priorities. That could be considered as part of the wider associated guidance.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
On the first point about dealing with anonymity, the relevant section of the bill sets out provisions to protect the confidentiality of information that has been obtained on behalf of the land and communities commissioner in the course of their investigations. However, I recognise some of the dynamics that are at play here and, from listening to the evidence that the committee received, why the ability to be anonymous is of concern. I am happy to consider any particular views that the committee has on that.
I am sorry—I missed the second part of your question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I come back to the rationale for why the provisions have been proposed in the way that they have been in the bill. They are designed so that the land and communities commissioner can investigate a breach only if there is a report from one of the defined bodies in the bill. Ultimately, that is to try to balance the commissioner’s enforcing role with the Scottish Land Commission’s advisory role. However, from the evidence, I feel that people have generally felt—although some have disagreed—that the commissioner should have the power to have an investigatory role; I am sure that the convener will correct me if I am wrong. I am open to considering recommendations about that if there is a particularly strong view on that.
Overall monitoring of compliance will be critical. As we have discussed in relation to the other measures that the bill introduces, we need to ensure that what we are introducing is having the desired effect.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I am sorry—do you mean in relation to overall investment in the land or how to take those proposals forward?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
Again, we have set the threshold at the level that we have in order to try to balance all those factors.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
No, I do not see why it should do that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I hope that he can help, if I cannot.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I believe that we are taking important steps in that direction with the bill through a number of means. Looking back to the initial aims of the bill that the convener set out—what it proposes to do—one of the key issues, and the reason why we are introducing pre-notification, land management plans and provisions around those, is the need to increase transparency about land ownership and management and to enable communities to have more of a say in how the land on which they live and work is managed. The bill will enable that.
Because of the scale of some land transfers and the size of some landholdings, the land tends to be sold quite infrequently. We are also seeing an increase in private off-market sales. In previous years, about 60 per cent of estate sales were private and off-market. Sometimes the opportunity to utilise community right to buy mechanisms will have gone before communities realised that the land was becoming available for sale, because they had not anticipated that it would become available or because the land had already been sold, so they would not have had the opportunity to use their rights in legislation.
The steps that we have set out in relation to those measures will help with overall transparency and will enable communities to have another route into right to buy. There are also important provisions about the transfer test and the potential for the lotting of land where we think that it will have a positive impact on community sustainability. That has the potential to increase land supply and the diversity of land ownership in Scotland.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mairi Gougeon
We would have to give greater thought to how that could be done and to the evidence base that we would use if that was to be the proposal.