The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1501 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
I have been asking similar questions to Mark Ruskell’s about land management plans. How do we ensure that the plans add value—instead of being just performative and adding bureaucracy—either on their own or with other processes, such as local place plans? Max Wiszniewski made the point that owning land is a privilege, because very few people in Scotland do so. In relation to rights and responsibilities, what needs to be done to strengthen the bill to ensure that land management plans can add to our net zero ambitions and our climate and nature goals? Is something missing from that part of the bill? What should we advise the Government to do differently in the bill to ensure that land management plans do good things for Scotland?
I see Sarah Madden nodding, so I will bring her in first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
Does anyone else have a view on whether we need to amend the bill when it comes to land management plans? Tara Wight? I think that Tara is possibly—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
How would you try to balance public access aspirations with security? Would you consult communities on a land management plan that would set out principles for the short, medium and, possibly, long term? That is the kind of work that you do already—is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
I will ask a final question, because I know that the convener will want to move on. We heard from the first panel of witnesses that perhaps there needs to be more emphasis on biodiversity. Rather than just sustaining biodiversity, the land management plan should be a tool to improve and increase biodiversity. Do you have a view on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you, Tara. Sorry for the confusion and interruption. I know that it is harder when you are not in the room.
I do not know whether Max Wiszniewski has any comments to make, after which I will hand back to you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
Is there anything that you would like to say to the committee about what should be different from what the Government proposes on land management plans in the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill? Would you like to see any changes?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
It is helpful to get that on the record. We might revisit the matter in the future. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
That is really helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Monica Lennon
I am grateful to hear about the document, but I am keen to get a real-world example of how you apply those different charters and best practice ideals. Could you give the committee a place-based example?