The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1472 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
So the intention is, through the regulations, to reduce—it is hoped—the impact of odour, which would lead to a reduction in complaints, but if there are complaints, members of the public should go to the local authority in the first instance.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
Okay—thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
That sounds shambolic. Many constituents and communities across Scotland are worried that they do not have any effective means of challenging decisions about the environment that are made by public authorities We know that judicial review is very expensive and that it looks at process rather than the merit of a decision. It sounds as though you are saying that there is no real leadership.
We on the committee are all well aware that Scotland has a serious nature and climate emergency to tackle. Hearing words such as “lacklustre” and “shoddy” and the Government passing the independent watchdog of the ESS a “poisoned chalice” is quite alarming. Where does Scotland go from here?
To pick up on the point about the lack of data reporting, I am keen to get some clarity about the timeline. It sounds as though, if we eventually report that data, there will be quite a big gap in time. It worries me that we are creating opportunities for polluters to continue to wreck and damage Scotland’s environment with little consequence.
What more can ESS do on environmental governance? Who needs to be held to account on the gap in and reporting of environmental data?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
I hope that you do not mind me interrupting you, Richard. You do not appear very confident on the issue. Data that is collected but not analysed or reported does not serve any purpose. Can you be more precise about the topics that you are referring to? When you say that the environmental data is either being collected and not reported or it is not being collected, can you give some examples to the committee of what you mean?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
To recap, we are in breach of the Aarhus convention because people do not have proper rights to challenge environmental decisions by public bodies, the Scottish Government does not appear committed to enacting a right to a healthy environment and we do not seem to have a proper system of collecting and reporting environmental data. Do the Scottish Government and the other public bodies that have a role take the climate and nature emergency seriously enough?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
Thanks for that.
One of the recommendations in the 2016 review was that planning guidance on the use of sewage sludge in land restoration should be reviewed. I do not think that that has happened yet. Can you give an update?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
The public are still very concerned. Scottish Water has obviously made some progress, but are you satisfied that the actions that were set out in responses from Scottish Water, the Scottish Government and SEPA to the ESS investigation report on storm overflow will address your recommendations? I hear what you say about the Scottish Water overflow map, but do we now have a complete picture or is it still incomplete?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Monica Lennon
Is there anything in relation to CSO that should be in the long-term strategy that Scottish Water is consulting on?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Monica Lennon
On Mark Ruskell’s point, it is important that we get this right, as there has been a huge amount of public interest.
My comment is more on the enforcement side. It would be good to hear more from the Scottish Government about how it expects it to work in practice, given that the responsibilities of the enforcement officers will be very public facing. There will be a lot of public interest in getting this right.
I am relaxed about whether we raise that with the Government in writing or through its appearance at the committee, but we need to hear more from the Government about how the fixed-penalty notices will work in practice and about enforcement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Monica Lennon
That is helpful to know.
A few years ago—perhaps five or six years ago—you were on SEPA’s board, but there has been a lot of change since then. You have touched on some of the resource pressures. We hear in the committee and in our individual regions and constituencies that people feel that it is hard to get information if they report something to SEPA or have a concern about pollution, and the public do not always hear about the lighter touch that is taken by having a dialogue with people who might be causing pollution. It feels as though there is a growing gap between the concerns that are reported and what the public hear in relation to outcomes and resolutions.
You have talked about your role in the networks and your insight. I have given the example of SEPA, but it is not the only organisation with such issues. How do you see ESS being able to be fair but firm and being able to improve public understanding and confidence? Right now, people feel that there is not a lot of accountability.