The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3760 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much for that clarity. You will be aware that we have a second public evidence session this morning on Historic Environment Scotland, which has been the subject of a section 22 report by Audit Scotland. We have also carried out an inquiry into the Water Industry Commission for Scotland over the past year or so. Following the unearthing of issues through that investigation and the identification of issues through the audit, we were told by the cabinet secretary last year that the Scottish Government was planning “deep dives” into all parts of the public sector to review risks and that an examination was being conducted to make sure that the behaviours and practices that we had seen in WICS were not being replicated elsewhere in the public sector. Did that deep dive include Historic Environment Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
I will finish my series of questions by going back to the evidence that the committee took on 14 January from the Auditor General, who again pointed out that
“It is the responsibility of the permanent secretary, as the principal accountable officer of the Scottish Administration, to appoint the accountable officers of public bodies … We have seen a lack of clarity in why the Scottish Government chose not to appoint an accountable officer”.—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 14 January 2026; c 9.]
How would you respond to that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
Jackie McAllister, you are the chief financial officer for the Scottish Government, and you have just told us that the amount of funds that could have been recovered by this individual was at such a level that it warranted paying them, for a 10-month period, almost a quarter of a million pounds. Is that really how the Scottish Government views these things?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
So this situation could, presumably, be replicated in all kinds of organisations. My reading of the public finance manual is that you, as the principal accountable officer and permanent secretary of the Scottish Government, should step in in these situations to ensure that an accountable officer is in place. You take a different view, presumably.
09:45
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
Okay, but the Public Audit Committee has seen lots of examples of the CEO of an organisation no longer being in post. For example, Mr Irwin, the CEO of Ferguson Marine was not the accountable officer; other people were designated that role. The accountable officer does not need to be the CEO and, presumably, if the CEO is off, someone else in the organisation should be appointed to the post.
I will move on to the GFG Alliance. In the next few weeks, the committee will be taking evidence from representatives of the GFG Alliance, because we have a long-standing concern about the risk that the Scottish Government is exposed to as a result of its arrangements with the GFG Alliance. As a reminder, I note that that company is facing litigation from Companies House for failing to lodge accounts and is facing investigation by the Serious Fraud Office for fraudulent trading, money laundering and suspected fraud. The company’s auditors have walked out and, just this week, we read that Liberty Steel, which is part of the GFG group and operates the Dalzell plate mill in Motherwell, is not securing Ministry of Defence orders because of cash-flow issues.
What do you understand the level of risk to be from your arrangements with the GFG Alliance?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
Do you not accept the Auditor General’s view that it is a significant gap that the company has not lodged accounts, does not have auditors and is under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office? Are you seriously suggesting that that is the kind of company that you want to be dealing with?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
But it has not done that for years, Mr Irwin.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
So that is how it works. I just find it incredible that that is how the Scottish Government does its business.
You said, permanent secretary, that you were going to have a look at what the Auditor General said. What he told us was that he felt that approval for that kind of case should be made not at deputy director general level, but at director general level, or even at cabinet secretary level. What is your view on that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
Okay, but—
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Richard Leonard
Mr Smith from Audit Scotland told us that it was “an extreme case”, and the Auditor General told us that he did not think that there was
“sufficient oversight of the arrangement”.—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 17 December 2025; c 8.]
That is something for you to consider, permanent secretary.