The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3691 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Richard Leonard
I am a revolutionary, Mr Crosby.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I would like to go back to the 5 per cent vacancy factor, which is a major part of your savings plan. First, that is quite a blunt instrument, is it not? It is not something that is entirely within your control. Secondly, as we have discussed before, it can be detrimental to the morale of the workforce if people are leaving and it is a deliberate plan not to replace them. How are you managing that? Underlying that, I am challenging you—is it an ethical thing to do?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Other members of the commission might also have questions on staffing, but I want to move on to another area: the future of public audit model. In paragraph 35 of your submission, you talk about a
“root-and-branch review of public audit”.
Do you anticipate that that will deliver savings?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Richard Leonard
So that I understand how it works, is there a default position? Is it automatic that the filling of a vacancy is delayed? Or are some positions so important to the organisation that you would begin recruitment straight away? If you reached a 10 per cent vacancy factor during the 10th month of the year and people left at that point, would you recruit immediately? How does the dynamic of that work?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. My final question is on the balance that you have at the moment. Auditor General, you have already referred to the fact that private firms carry out around about a third of the public audit work in Scotland. What does your current market intelligence tell you about that? We have heard before that there might be some increase in the costs that the private sector would expect to enjoy in carrying that work out. You said that you expect to enter the next five-year cycle in 2027-28, which is not too far away. At this stage, what are you doing to understand where the market is and consider whether there are different options that the board, led by Mr Crosby, will need to consider?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Richard Leonard
I take that point completely.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Michael, you can ask one final question, but then we really need to move on.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed. When I read the report, and even just hearing your opening statement, I could weep, because this goes back, as the report points out, to at least 2018, but also before that. I think of Mandy McLaren, who lost her son Dale, and Gillian Murray, who lost her uncle to suicide around the Carseview site. Those very traumatic and moving human stories drove the Government to establish the Strang review, which led to reports, although we reached a point where there were complaints about reviews on reviews without progress being seen.
I read the litany of conclusions that you draw about the single site provision and what a mess that appears to be, about complicated structures and about stakeholder engagement being unclear. These are all familiar themes that we have been around the circuit on so many times. Meanwhile, people are being failed. It really does feel as though no progress has been made in the course of seven or eight years.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
Am I right in thinking that NHS Tayside is still at level 3 in the escalation process?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Richard Leonard
I will invite Joe FitzPatrick to come in in a second, but I have one last question before I do that.
One of the features of the earlier phases of the reviews and the responses from the health board was what David Strang described as overreporting of progress and an optimism bias. Rachel Browne talked about realism and so on. What is your sense of whether the board is being given an overoptimistic picture of what is changing on the ground? What is your sense of whether the board is being presented with cold, hard facts about where things have reached? As I mentioned at the beginning, the section 22 report mentions a whole series of areas where things are not going as they ought to go.