The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3006 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
To go back to the question of proportionateness, I put to you the evidence that we heard from the Scottish Information Commissioner, who characterised the situation around audit as being
“a never-ending cycle of constant audit for us”.—[Official Report, SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee, 20 February 2025; c 16.]
Do you recognise that characterisation?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thank you
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you—that is helpful.
I put the same question to Colin Smyth.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
On the question about an advocacy role versus a regulatory role, what do you think the balance would likely be?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Richard Leonard
I welcome everyone to the eighth meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee. Under agenda item 1, do committee members agree to take items 4, 5 and 6 in private this morning?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Richard Leonard
I am going to move swiftly along. I invite Stuart McMillan to put some questions to you on public service reform.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Graham Simpson, do you have a final question?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Fifty-five thousand. I am sorry—less is more, as I keep saying. I am trying to take you at your word. We might get it down to 11,000 before the end of the meeting.
My point is that the fact that there are lots of words does not answer the point that is made both in the report and in some of the other evidence that has been presented to us, which is that insufficient attention is paid at the ground level—not as a retrospective add-on—to budget decisions, which is what we are speaking about in this context, and how they affect different groups in society differently.
We might return to some of those themes, but I will move on and invite Graham Simpson to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Richard Leonard
You have said that some publications will be produced over the next couple of months, and you have referred to the medium-term financial strategy. There was previous criticism from a range of parties, not least the Auditor General, that there did not seem to be any real reason why a medium-term financial strategy could not have been produced earlier. We have been told that there was a general election and then an autumn budget statement by the incoming Government, but the consensus seems to be that a strategy could have been produced.
Anyway, a strategy is coming out in May this year and there has also been reference to a fiscal sustainability delivery plan. Please give us a bit more detail about what level of information will be contained in those two pieces of work, why it is necessary to have two and what different roles they perform.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Richard Leonard
That was a very comprehensive answer—there is quite a lot to take in. It is only when we see written documentation that has been generated by that thinking that we will be able get a proper analysis of, and apply proper scrutiny to, what has been proposed.
Going back to what we do know, I note that key message number 1 in the report that we are considering this morning is, frankly, a criticism that the Government appears to be locked into a fairly short-term culture. That key message says:
“The Scottish Government continues to take short-term decisions, reacting to events rather than making fundamental changes to how public money is spent. This approach has so far been effective in balancing the budget”—
you made that point, Ms Stafford—
“but risks disrupting services at short notice and restricting progress towards better long-term outcomes for people.”
We have heard what you have told us, but what can you do to reassure us that there will be a change in culture from short-termism to at least medium-termism, if not long-termism?