The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3006 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
It was really useful to get that on the record. It also seems to me that you are saying that there is a real issue with transparency, and that is a matter of real importance to us, as the Public Audit Committee. If we cannot trace where the money is going and how effectively it is being applied, it becomes quite difficult to make any informed, evidence-based assessment of what is and is not working.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
I said earlier that Stuart McMillan had some more questions to put to you. Now that we are getting into the last lap, Stuart, I will pass over to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
I want to drill into that a little bit. Paragraph 35 states that the Scottish Government has provided £15 million per annum, which is specific funding that is given to all councils for ASL provision. You gave a bit of context to that in your answers to Graham Simpson. However, when I read the briefing, I am looking at graphs that tell me about an 800 per cent rise in demand and your concerns about the outcomes for pupils who require additional support for learning. Against that backdrop, I am reading that £15 million per annum, which is identifiable expenditure for all councils since 2021, represents
“a 15 per cent real-terms decrease.”
Am I reading that correctly?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
I always make the point in these discussions that children are only eight, 12 or 15 once, so if we do not get it right now, there is no point in coming back in three years and saying that these are our conclusions and recommendations, because it is too late for that cohort of young people.
I invite Stuart McMillan to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. We will explore the issues around the gaps in the data more over the course of the morning.
I have a question about SEEMiS, the education management information system that is mentioned in the briefing. It struck me that some of the definitions are quite broad. One pupil in four needs additional support for learning due to
“social, emotional and behavioural difficulties”,
and there is a calculation that around 10 per cent of pupils require ASL for “other” needs, without it being specified what those needs are.
How does having such broad definitions and uncategorised groups in the system affect the ability to target, plan and resource properly to affect the outcomes, which is what we are interested in?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Yoshiko, do you want to comment on that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Is that one of the things that the project board is charged with addressing? If, as you say, the situation is complicated and there are different streams, which I presume are going at different rates at different times, it becomes difficult to understand whether there is proper resourcing. You talk about the need for a national measurement framework, which does not currently exist. I presume that that would help to pull some of this together, would it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. Before we finish up, Auditor General, I note that, in the very final section of the briefing, you say something that has been a thread running through this morning’s evidence. The expression that you use is that
“The ASL Project Board has made limited progress”.
We have had a number of questions on that area. You set out that the ASL board was charged with implementing or having oversight over a 76-point action plan and that 40 of the 76 action points have been achieved or completed. The question that is in the air is: what about the 36 action points that have not been fully implemented? What are they and what progress has been made with them?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Richard Leonard
It will not be regulating things itself.