The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3014 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Mr Hobbs.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
For the record, is the procuring body the Scottish Government, or is it Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd, which the Scottish Government is the sole shareholder in?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay, thank you. I am conscious of the time, so I will move on. Colin Beattie has some questions to put to you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thanks for clearing that up.
I want to go back to the cases involving settlement agreements. You said that there had been three that were above the threshold and two had not been approved. The Scottish Government had clearly taken a dim view of those, and indeed
“has not provided retrospective approval”.
Can I take you to the case that it did approve? In paragraph 14 of your section 22 report, you say that the former chief executive’s employment was terminated “citing unsatisfactory performance”. However, paragraph 14 of the Scottish public finance manual says quite clearly that
“Settlement Agreements should not be used to deal with poor performance”,
so why would the Scottish Government approve such a settlement?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. I want to pick up on a couple of points relating to Stuart McMillan’s questions to you. Back on 1 June 2023, Mr Miller, the chair of the board of FMPG, had an exchange with the committee in which we asked him about the performance bonuses that seemed to prevail at the time, particularly among the senior management team. He said that they were not performance bonuses but retention payments. I suppose that there are two ways of looking at that. Is it the case that there is no longer a retention payments regime so people are leaving the business en bloc, or does some kind of performance bonus system still exist that applies to members of the senior management team at FMPG?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
I accept that process was followed, but the Scottish public finance manual has a certain status, does it not? The situation is probably a reflection on previous inquiries, including those that this committee has conducted, into situations where people have performed badly and, to use a colloquialism, have been rewarded for bad behaviour. They have walked out of a public sector organisation with a large amount of public money by way of a settlement agreement when, in most objective observers’ eyes, they should not have received some kind of reward but should have left with no extra payments other than those that they were contractually due.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
To recap the figures involved, the person was originally engaged on a salary of £36,000, which then rose to £54,000. However, what the report documents is that, in the period from February 2023 to March 2024, FMPG was invoiced by the individual’s company for £144,000. That is quite a leap in payment, is it not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
If the individual was seconded from CMAL, I presume that CMAL was party to those agreements.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Stuart McMillan has the final question.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Richard Leonard
I want to be clear about what Mr Boyd said. He said that the original £36,000 was the net salary figure. We are looking at the other figures. I presume that the invoice for £144,000 did not take account of the fact that there was going to be a tax liability of £48,000.