The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3006 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Richard Leonard
What is that as a percentage, roughly? It is not 80 per cent, is it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Thanks very much indeed. It has been quite a long session. I thank our four witnesses for their attempts to answer our questions.
We are at a point where you have committed to giving us a bit more information and a bit more of your analysis, as and when those are available, and we very much welcome that. We may need to follow up a little bit more on our conversation about exhibit 3 in the Audit Scotland report—the terminology and what is and is not meant by different rows and columns in that presentation.
There have been some really useful points of discussion this morning, and some things that I think we will want to follow up as a committee.
I echo remarks made by other members of the committee that we very much appreciate that you have paid heed to some of our areas of interest in previous years, particularly, for example, where there has been a failure by employers to properly comply with the S code requirements and what the profile of those employers looks like. We very much encourage you to keep on working on that.
I draw this morning’s public session to a close by thanking Alyson Stafford and Lorraine King from the Scottish Government, and Jonathan Athow and Phil Batchelor from HMRC. Thank you very much indeed. We will now move into private session.
11:23 Meeting continued in private until 11:53.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. The deputy convener, Jamie Greene, will ask the last round of questions.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Do you retrospectively check how accurate the estimates and adjustments were—particularly the estimates—and set them alongside the actual outturns?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Richard Leonard
The Scottish Human Rights Commission has made a pitch for more powers, including, I think, some powers of enforcement. I guess that the equivalent might be the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission, which has the power to support litigation and mount its own inquiries and so on. It has demonstrably more power, yet nobody thinks that that is an interference with the due process of Parliament or Government.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Richard Leonard
That is fine. We put that to the test with the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman over the case of the women against state pension inequality, in which there was an ombudsman recommendation that the Government chose not to implement.
Can I go into a final area that is related to this? Setting aside the enforcement part, I will move on to regulation and adjudication. In some commissions, such as the Scottish Information Commissioner and the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, those seems to be combined. However, if we look at the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland, there is a separation between regulation and adjudication in the Scottish landscape. Is that a unique example in your experience, or are there other instances where there is a separation between those two functions?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. I have finished my questions, convener.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Dr Lamont, you also reflect on the difference between soft powers and hard powers. Does that help us to define the purpose of different commissions and commissioners? Alison Payne mentioned that the Scottish Commissioner for Children and Young People and the Scottish Information Commissioner might be interchangeable in some of the work that they do. However, the latter has certain powers of enforcement, whereas the former does not. Does any of you want to reflect on that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I am interested in finding out your views on language. How interchangeable are some of the terms that are used in the discussion about what purpose the different commissions and commissioners fulfil?
When we started this exercise, we were told that, typically, some commissions are regulatory and some deal with advocacy. Alison Payne, you have talked about advocacy and integrity commissions and commissioners. Ruth Lamont, you have talked about regulatory commissions but also about contested social needs commissioners and special interest commissioners. Dr Elliott, you have talked about developing a strategic state. Are those terms interchangeable or do they represent the different profiles, powers and purposes of different commissioners?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Richard Leonard
Does anybody else want to come in on that?