Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3014 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

Your own framework agreement, which you signed off, says that there is a responsibility on the Scottish Government’s strategic commercial assets division to

“address in a timely manner any significant issues arising in the organisation including financial and operational and when appropriate intervening”.

Why have there not been interventions in the cases that were identified in the audit report?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

For 15 minutes?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

It might have been useful for us to see those minutes before you came to give evidence.

On a related point, Mr Irwin, because you have written to us previously to inform us, we know that you plan to publish an information pack on the due diligence reports in connection with FMPG and also a few other instances. That is due to be published in two days. Is there any reason why that could not have been published in advance of today’s meeting and evidence session?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

In the interest of establishing some facts for the record, I have a couple of quick questions. I am hoping for quick answers, following the discussion that you have just had with Mr Simpson.

Mr Irwin, I think that you said that you were made aware on 28 February that the board was considering dismissing, or was going to dismiss, Mr Tydeman. That is at a slight variance with what Parliament was told by the cabinet secretary, who said that on 28 February she was told that the board was considering action. It was only on 18 March that she was informed that there was the intention to dismiss Mr Tydeman in the week commencing 25 March. Could you clear that up for us, please?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

Stuart, I am sorry—

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

Sure.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

I asked this question of John Boyd from Audit Scotland. Is it a single award? Is there an expectation that the award may be the subject of subcontracting and a sharing of the contract, or will there be just one tender and one beneficiary?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Richard Leonard

In the interests of time I will now move things on. I invite Graham Simpson to put some questions to you.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Richard Leonard

Yes—you have not paid a visit to the Public Audit Committee recently, which is always a good sign.

I have one final question. In the debate that is taking place about the future landscape of bodies such as yours, there has been an attempt to forge a distinction between the commissioners and commissions that are regulatory and those that have an advocacy function. In addition, distinctions are sometimes drawn between the commissions and commissioners that are proactive and those that are reactive. How would you define the work that you do? Is it regulatory only, or is there some advocacy? Is it simply reactive, or do you do proactive work as well?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Richard Leonard

Thanks very much. Good morning, Ms Vestri. On the last point that you made, to what extent is the Standards Commission regulatory only, to what extent does it have any kind of advocacy role, to what extent is it reactive—just dealing with complaints as they come through the system—and to what extent do you see your role as being proactive?