The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3014 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Your own framework agreement, which you signed off, says that there is a responsibility on the Scottish Government’s strategic commercial assets division to
“address in a timely manner any significant issues arising in the organisation including financial and operational and when appropriate intervening”.
Why have there not been interventions in the cases that were identified in the audit report?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
For 15 minutes?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
It might have been useful for us to see those minutes before you came to give evidence.
On a related point, Mr Irwin, because you have written to us previously to inform us, we know that you plan to publish an information pack on the due diligence reports in connection with FMPG and also a few other instances. That is due to be published in two days. Is there any reason why that could not have been published in advance of today’s meeting and evidence session?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
In the interest of establishing some facts for the record, I have a couple of quick questions. I am hoping for quick answers, following the discussion that you have just had with Mr Simpson.
Mr Irwin, I think that you said that you were made aware on 28 February that the board was considering dismissing, or was going to dismiss, Mr Tydeman. That is at a slight variance with what Parliament was told by the cabinet secretary, who said that on 28 February she was told that the board was considering action. It was only on 18 March that she was informed that there was the intention to dismiss Mr Tydeman in the week commencing 25 March. Could you clear that up for us, please?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Stuart, I am sorry—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Sure.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
I asked this question of John Boyd from Audit Scotland. Is it a single award? Is there an expectation that the award may be the subject of subcontracting and a sharing of the contract, or will there be just one tender and one beneficiary?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Richard Leonard
In the interests of time I will now move things on. I invite Graham Simpson to put some questions to you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes—you have not paid a visit to the Public Audit Committee recently, which is always a good sign.
I have one final question. In the debate that is taking place about the future landscape of bodies such as yours, there has been an attempt to forge a distinction between the commissioners and commissions that are regulatory and those that have an advocacy function. In addition, distinctions are sometimes drawn between the commissions and commissioners that are proactive and those that are reactive. How would you define the work that you do? Is it regulatory only, or is there some advocacy? Is it simply reactive, or do you do proactive work as well?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Thanks very much. Good morning, Ms Vestri. On the last point that you made, to what extent is the Standards Commission regulatory only, to what extent does it have any kind of advocacy role, to what extent is it reactive—just dealing with complaints as they come through the system—and to what extent do you see your role as being proactive?