The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3014 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Let me move on to another area that your report draws attention to and which you mentioned in your opening statement. The reconciliation figure for 2025-26 is £449 million—nearly half a billion pounds—which is the largest reconciliation to date. Is there a likelihood that that level of reconciliation will continue in the future? How does that affect the Scottish Government’s budget setting?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
You have powers of statutory investigation. Do you have powers of statutory enforcement?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes. We are allowed to comment on that, but I recognise that you may not be.
I will turn to a couple of more technical questions that I hope that you will be able to answer in full. There are issues around measurement and reporting mechanisms. What are the gaps in the current reporting mechanisms that you use? Are there obstacles that you have identified? How are you, as the ombudsman, addressing those?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Is your performance captured, recorded and publicly available?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes. The other question that I wanted to ask if we had the time is about the measures that you have implemented to make sure that your office functions well within the landscape around public bodies, commissions and commissioners. Can you comment on that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. You have mentioned powers a couple of times already. You have spoken about the possible benefit of having more information-sharing powers and you have alluded to own-initiative powers. You notably told the Finance and Public Administration Committee last year:
“We are not doing the job that we think we should be doing because we do not have the right legislative remit.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 30 April 2024; c 37.]
Can you elaborate on what you meant by that? Is it about those own-initiative powers or about information-sharing powers or about more than that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That is interesting because one of the questions that we are asking people when they appear before us is to what extent they are reactive and to what extent they are proactive.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. I was going to ask about the extent to which you see yourself as being a regulatory or advocacy agent.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Richard Leonard
I think that I am asking more about the operational aspect than the statutory aspect.