The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3443 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
But, as I understand it, the exodus of staff—or the big turnover of staff—happened this year, in 2025, did it not? The report is on the financial year 2023-24, when there was the complete absence of any budget.
Auditor General, you are presenting this report to Parliament because you have serious concerns about what happened. I suppose that the question is why those serious concerns were not picked up at an earlier point by either UHI or the Scottish Funding Council.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. I am going to move things along and invite Graham Simpson to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
I read a report that suggested that, under the principal and CEO who has now left but who held that position at the time of the audit, there were five different finance directors, which again is an interesting indication of the instability of that function inside the college.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed. We have come to the end of our time on this report. I thank Mark MacPherson, Nicola Wright and the Auditor General for presenting their evidence. The committee will need to consider what our next steps are. We are about to keep two of you, but lose Ms Wright, as we change over witnesses. To allow us to change witnesses, I briefly suspend the meeting.
11:16 Meeting suspended.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
Graham Simpson has indicated that he does not have any questions. Colin Beattie, do you have any questions?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed. I take you back to your second last point about the role of UHI, which is the regional strategic body that has some kind of oversight of the college, and the role of the Scottish Funding Council. What part do they play in oversight and governance of a college such as UHI Perth?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
One of the fundamental questions that the committee has for you is whether you can think of many other circumstances where a public body has not set a budget. Similarly, and related to that, you make the point in the report that the internal audit function could not be relied upon at all. You could not set any store by or place any credence in the internal audit function. Again, I cannot remember reading a report where that has been highlighted in such a way.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
I think that we have some further questions on that area later, but I will now invite Colin Beattie to ask some questions.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Richard Leonard
I am conscious that two members of the committee still have questions to ask, so, if we could press on, that would be helpful. Deputy convener, over to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Richard Leonard
My understanding is that the OBR forecasts, which are built into the Scottish Fiscal Commission forecasts, relate to the situation before the reforms were shelved. There was a revolt against the proposed reforms to PIP, which led to the brake being put on and Stephen Timms being appointed to head up a review. For the next year or so, there will not, as I understand it, be reforms to PIP. There will need to be a revision, so Joe FitzPatrick is right—the £770 million is based on the world as it looked like it was going to be, not the world as it currently is.
I will bring Joe FitzPatrick back in a bit later, but I will now invite Graham Simpson to put some questions to you.