The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Fine—thank you. I will now invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
The traffic-light system at the end of the report, which indicates which services are exceeding the targets and which are falling below them, is a very useful addition. On the face of it, if a health board was overspending its budget and achieving much better outcomes for its population, one could say that there might be some merit in that, but, in the report, you portray a health board that is overspending its budget and relying on bailout loans from the Scottish Government and which, even then, is still not meeting targets on accident and emergency waiting times and so on.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
I am conscious of the time, so I will move things along by inviting Colin Beattie to continue to pursue the fctheme of financial sustainability.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
I will now invite Graham Simpson to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Welcome back. We will now turn to agenda item 3, which is consideration of the 2024-25 audit of NHS Grampian, which has warranted the production of a section 22 report. I am pleased to welcome back the Auditor General, Stephen Boyle. I also welcome back Leigh Johnston, who is a senior manager at Audit Scotland. We are joined for this session by Alison Cumming, who is executive director, performance audit and best value, at Audit Scotland.
Before we ask our questions, I invite the Auditor General to make an opening statement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. Of course, the IJB structure was set by legislation passed by this Parliament, so it is very much of interest to us that you are doing further work in this area to see whether the intention has been carried out in the implementation.
I will invite Joe FitzPatrick to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. I will finish where we started. As I understand it, this is the first time in 20 years—two decades—that a section 22 report has been presented to Parliament on NHS Grampian. The final question from me is: what has led us to this point? In the report, you start off by talking about the financial position: the £65.2 million brokerage in the financial year that the audit is from, the loans outstanding being £90 million and so on. If it was just the financial position alone, would that warrant a section 22 report, or is it warranted by a combination of the financial position together with those performance issues, the Healthcare Improvement Scotland inspection of Dr Gray’s in Elgin and the traffic-light performance review attached to the report, which shows there are some major areas of concern in delivery of key treatments? Is it around the bed capacity issue? If it was just performance issues, would there be a section 22 report? If it was just financial issues, would there be a section 22 report? Is it because there are both sets of issues that it warrants, in your view, a section 22 report presented to Parliament to outline your concerns?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay, thank you. On that key message, we will draw this morning’s evidence session to a close.
Thank you again for the very useful evidence that you have provided for the committee this morning in our consideration of the audit report into NHS Grampian. I thank Alison Cumming, Leigh Johnston and the Auditor General for providing us with lots of food for thought.
I will now, as previously agreed, move the committee into private session. Thank you.
11:54 Meeting continued in private until 12:10.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Item 2 is consideration of the 2024-25 audit of NHS Ayrshire and Arran. I am very pleased to welcome this morning the Auditor General, Stephen Boyle. Good morning. Alongside the Auditor General are Fiona Mitchell-Knight, who is an audit director at Audit Scotland, and Leigh Johnston, who is a senior manager at Audit Scotland.
We have some questions to put to you on the section 22 report, Auditor General, but before we get to our questions, I invite you to make an opening statement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much for that comprehensive summary of the report, which touches on many of the areas that we want to ask you about.
You mentioned in that opening statement—and it is a stand-out conclusion of the report—that NHS Ayrshire and Arran has the highest level of outstanding brokerage of any territorial health board in Scotland. You say in the report that the figure for the audited year 2024-25 was £51.4 million, which represents 4.3 per cent of revenue resource limit.
Can you tell us how that compares with other health boards? Is NHS Ayrshire and Arran a real outlier or are there other health boards that are in a similar position or going in that direction?