The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3014 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Richard Leonard
It does not escape the notice of this committee that it is senior elected politicians, up to and including previous First Ministers, who have declared a climate emergency and, presumably, have pronounced on the need to meet the 20 per cent reduction target by 2030. If there is a lack of leadership, we might draw the conclusion that there is a lack of political leadership as well as a lack of some kind of agency leadership among those who are charged with delivering on this.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Richard Leonard
I invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to the Auditor General.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
I have a final question. You are very blunt in your written submission and take a position that is contrary to Mr Hamilton’s. you say that having individual corporate HQs is a “non-affordable luxury”. That is a clear statement of your view, and you are very strong on the issue of sharing services—that comes through in your evidence this morning and in your written submission.
In your written evidence, you also allude to the fact that you are dealing with data about vulnerable adults, children and young people, and you talk about information rights. To what extent do you collaborate and work with those other commissions? If you are dealing with the treatment of the biometric data of young people below the age of 18 and so on, do you have conversations with the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland on issues that are relevant to that age group or with the Scottish Human Rights Commission on, for example, a human rights approach to some of these questions? What is the extent of your interaction?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning, Mr Hamilton. You have already used some of the labels that I am going to ask about, and some of the terminology has been part and parcel of the first half hour of the session.
However, would you define yourself as a regulatory or advocacy commissioner? That is part 1 of my question.
You have covered part 2, particularly in answering Lorna Slater’s questions. To what extent are you simply reactive and to what extent are you proactive in carrying out your statutory duties?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That would be great.
In your written submission, you say that you have “strong statutory enforcement powers”. Do you have all the powers that you need?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That would be a change in the law rather than necessarily a change in your powers. Are there examples of your powers being insufficient? Do you feel as though your having more powers would lead to better outcomes?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
No. I read your submission last night, Mr Hamilton. That was in your submission.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Was it not? I am sorry, but can we just clear that up? Did you use the expression “financially hamstrung”?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
You spoke about “a cost/benefit analysis” and “an opportunity cost”. They are your words, are they not?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Could you elaborate on what you mean by that?