The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3389 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
We will return to this, but earlier you mentioned judge-led inquiries. I think that, to date, every inquiry in Scotland has been led by a judge, but that is not the case in England or in other countries, where, sometimes, a specialist in a particular area can lead an inquiry. Have you any thoughts on that? Every time that we take a judge out of the legal system, the court cases all pile up.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
So that has happened—fair enough.
The EIS, too, came out with something on Monday that talked about the level of ASN. I think that we are now up to 46 per cent in some places.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
The local authority might fund them, but that means that poorer families and less-educated families in my constituency cannot hope to get to Donaldson’s.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
I accept that a lot is going on and a lot of good things are happening—that is fine. However, you said that some councils have their own special needs school. In my constituency, there are two, but I get a lot more parents coming to me saying, “My kid has not coped at nursery, but they are now going to put him in mainstream primary 1.” Glasgow just does not seem to have available places, and the feeling in Glasgow is certainly that you need to have greater needs in order to get into a special needs school than you might need to have in some other areas.
We need some kind of national plan. Either we get rid of schools such as Donaldson’s and let the councils do it all themselves, or we somehow enable or encourage councils or whatever to refer needy kids to Donaldson’s. I only know Donaldson’s and one that I visited a few years ago—is it called Falkland House school?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
I will leave it at that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
As you and your team might know, cabinet secretary, we were recently looking at the Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill. As part of our consideration, we visited Donaldson’s school in Edinburgh, which I understand used to be a deaf school—or a school for deaf children—but which now focuses more on ASN, autism and similar issues. It was a really interesting visit, and we saw the school’s great facilities—it is an actual building in a beautiful location with a good number of staff. However, there were hardly any children.
My question, then, is this: where are we going with a school like that? Do we actually need a school like that if there are no kids there? What about the councils? I broadly agree with mainstreaming, but there are kids who seem to need a really special level of school. Those schools exist—we only visited Donaldson’s—but something is not working in that space. We have needy kids in Glasgow who have to stay in Glasgow, either because that is all Glasgow can afford, or because Glasgow thinks that it can do this itself, and here we have a facility that is just sitting there.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
Turning to the timescale, I know that we will have a statement in the Parliament this afternoon, so I can ask the questions again then if you do not know the answers. What is the timescale for the review in which Professor Jay is involved? Is there a cost to it? At that point, would a decision be made about whether to hold a public inquiry?
10:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
One of the outcomes of the review might or might not be that there should be a full public inquiry. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
What is your opinion on public inquiries? In the finance committee, we have found that some public inquiries can go on for a long time, which can be disappointing for victims, because they might hope to get something a bit more quickly. There is also the question of expense. At the moment, one inquiry in Scotland has cost £50 million and another has cost £100 million. That takes money away from front-line services. Do you feel that public inquiries are often a good thing, or are they a good thing only sometimes?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
John Mason
I do not want to cut you off, but we are tight for time. I hope that the committee’s report will come out in the next few weeks, which will cover some of that.
Looking forward, my understanding is that the inquiry that will take place in England will have a time limit of three years and a cost limit of £65 million. In our experience in Scotland, it is a little bit unusual that there should be a time limit. Some judges argue that there should never be a time limit. What are your thoughts on that? Is it realistic?