The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3168 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
When the proposals come up, if I understand this correctly, they get circulated around a number of bodies and those bodies can then respond. The suggestion is that, if a lot are negative, the Government might not go ahead with it. Is it always the case that the final proposal is put out for consultation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Thanks very much, both of you. That was helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Thanks—that is also helpful.
As I understand it, most inquiries in Sweden—and it is the same in Norway—take place in private, not public. Professor Dahlström, can you tell us why that is the case and whether you feel that it is an advantage or a disadvantage?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Maybe I can press you on that a little bit. For example, one of the big aims of the Covid inquiry here has been to allow victims, such as family members who lost somebody in a care home, to have the opportunity to speak and share their experience and all that kind of thing. Would that aspect be public in Sweden?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
I fear that that is where we are at the moment.
In answer to Liz Smith, you talked about building trust in institutions. You are a little bit more optimistic than I am. I am not sure whether that is even possible, because we have social media nowadays. I know that, in the past, newspapers and other things were always undermining institutions, but there was so much negative stuff, even to the extent that Covid did not exist and all that sort of thing. Is it possible to build up public trust or do we have to accept that trust is falling and, even if standards stay the same, there will be more demand for inquiries, blame, vengeance and all those things?
11:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Thanks. That is helpful.
Dr Prasser, is it the same in Australia? Is having a group of people rather than just one person the norm?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
I have a couple of other points, both of which relate to Sweden. As I understand it, if there are recommendations, there has to be a proposal as to how those will be funded. Is that the case?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
That raises the question of privacy as against everything being in public. I had had the impression from what we had read that inquiries in Sweden are largely in private, but I now think that that is not the case. They discuss certain things in private and have other evidence in public. Is there any argument for maybe doing more of an inquiry in private? Would people be more open in their evidence if it were in private?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Yes. I will finish on that note.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
John Mason
Thank you for all the evidence so far. It has been most interesting.
If I may start with yourself, Professor Dahlström, I was interested that there was general public acceptance of the Coronavirus Commission and its results—and it was incredibly quick. It started, as I understand it, in June 2020 and completed in February 2022, which was under two years, and cost very little money.
Sweden was very interesting and a lot of people here felt that we should be copying Sweden, instead of the people that we did copy. In one sense, what your country did was quite controversial and yet the inquiry happened very quickly. Was it too quick? Would there have been an advantage if it had either started a bit later or gone on a bit longer?