The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3647 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
The negative block grant adjustment has increased, which means that there is more of a block grant adjustment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I will leave it at that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I was going to come in on what you were saying about committees, convener, because I am also inclined to think that it is more about the individual. I do not know whether I can press Alison Payne any more on the importance of the individuals. You also mentioned that new MSPs can come in with certain skills, but some of the conveners who I feel have struggled most in here have been new MSPs who have never been on a committee before. Yes, they have been on a board of something outside, but they do not know how it works and they do not know the relationship with the clerks. On the one hand, I have seen a convener who saw the clerks as basically part of his staff, and on the other hand, I have seen a convener who was basically controlled by the clerks.
I am just making a comment in a sense—you can have all sorts of structures, but is it not the individual that matters most?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Hopefully, yes. I am still intrigued by that. However, I accept that we are still fairly new on some of the benefits and that they will take time to settle down.
Could we dig a little deeper into the student loan valuation? Could you, or one of your officials, explain it to me?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
That is what I was wondering.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Right, okay. That touches on the next question that I was going to ask. We do not really have DEL and AME, do we? Those are Westminster terms, as I understand it. We simply have resource.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Are those not falling? That is the intention.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Ms Davidson mentioned the question of outcomes as against inputs and outputs. That also appeared in your paper, Ms Payne, so I will ask you to expand on that.
Your paper says that you were concerned about a lack of data to evaluate outcomes and about a
“focus more on inputs over outcomes.”
We have raised this issue often over the years, but is it not inevitable that a Parliament such as this one focuses on inputs—how much money we are spending on things—or have other people got it right?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I want to ask Professor Cairney about choices. I am interested in something that you wrote. Your submission says:
“the NPF often gives the impression that a government does not need to make these hard choices”,
and then there is the point about engaging the public. Can you expand on how we do that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I will build on that a little. If we were to speak to our successor committee, should we be saying, “You need to be a bit more blunt with people?” Should politicians be more blunt and say, “We’ve got hard choices to make”, or are politicians just victims of what is happening in society?