The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2507 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
So it is extra to people’s normal work.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
That is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
Presumably, that cannot really happen until the bill is through.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
That is helpful. I just wanted to get a feel of how things are going.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
If the bill goes through as it is at the moment—obviously, it could be amended—will that change your relationship with qualifications Scotland?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
That is great. My second question is on stakeholder groups. There are quite a lot of different groups. There are interest committees, which colleagues will go into in more detail, as well as advisory bodies. However, if we take the wider term, which is stakeholder groups, can you say anything about your experience of that?
Megan Farr mentioned young people being involved in the education system, but perhaps the other two witnesses could tell us how that has been working until now. Do you think that young people’s voices have been heard? You suggested that parents’ voices have not been heard very much. Is the stakeholder group model, or the advisory group model, good?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
Your evidence said that young people are often more comfortable in a group of young people than they are in a mixed group.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
If nobody new is coming in, does that not give the staff some reassurance that their present jobs are quite safe?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
I will move on to the process of moving into the new structures. I have picked up from the evidence that staff have been unsettled by the lengthy period of change and the uncertainty as to where they fit in and so on. Can you give us any update about where we are in that transition process? Are staff feeling any more comfortable and relaxed about it? Are they clearer about what will happen, or do we have to get the bill through first before we can really answer that? I go to Ms Rodger first, but I put that to all of the witnesses.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
John Mason
That would suggest that you want things to get decided as soon as possible.