The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2507 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
Okay—thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
Your compliance figures look good. I presume that part of your job is to upset people who do not want to pay tax, and that your customer satisfaction score could never be 100 per cent, because some people just—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
I picked up that you have had a few issues with the three-yearly lease reviews. Could you explain why we have the reviews and what the problems were?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
It is not just an admin thing; it could involve tax revenues.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
Do you have any suggestions as to where the capital should come from?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
According to the savings section of the financial memorandum, it does not appear that the bill will result in a lot of savings. At the moment, it seems to me that parents—better-off parents, I presume—are paying most of the money for kids to have residential experiences. I think that 60 per cent or thereabouts of primary school kids go on residential trips at present. That means that there will be a big saving for better-off parents. Is that the best use of the money? I do not know what proportion of the £30 million, in effect, represents a saving to parents—maybe we are talking about half or a third of it. Is there not a better way of using public money? Some parents are willing and able to contribute, and some schools say that they benefit from fundraising and from kids working together to raise money for such events. Will we not lose out on all of that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
It might need to be reviewed. That is great, thanks very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
What was the reason for the three-yearly reviews? Most 10-year leases will not change.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
Okay. That is helpful. Perhaps the issue can go into Liz Smith’s finance bill when it comes along.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
That is very kind, convener.
Along with Ross Greer, I have the privilege of being on the Education, Children and Young People Committee, so we have had a lot more background on the bill. I will press you a little more on capital spending, which the convener asked about. The education committee got the impression that some outdoor centres are really struggling and people’s expectations of them are rising. Some of the buildings were built in 1939—as it happens, I have stayed in some of those.
The current model seems to be that schools pay for only the running costs and that the capital funding for outdoor centres has to come from other sources. The centres are going around to trusts to beg for money and are fundraising and doing different things. I get the impression that some of the centres seem to be a little more successful than others, but that is to be expected. The suggestion was made that if an outdoor centre hits a major financial challenge, it may well close. The current funding model is working to an extent, but not hugely, and the councils have largely closed their centres. Surely, going forward, the model cannot continue, and some new money must come in on the capital side?