The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2507 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I realise that every organisation is different, and maybe Chris Kerr can explain how Registers of Scotland can manage that cut without needing any extra input. By contrast, Food Standards Scotland says in its submission that it just wants more money and more people. Could we just cut funding by 10 per cent for everybody? Would that work, Chris?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
What would that mean? What is it that the Government does not understand? It has flexed the budget successfully during the year in the past two years. One scenario would be that, if it was you and me personally, we would try to save money so that, if we have a bad year, we would have some savings. However, the Government effectively cannot do that, because we have a limit on how much we can save, and because there is huge political pressure against saving money, when all the parties want us to spend every single penny. I am struggling to understand what the Government is missing, what it is not doing that it should be doing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I do not want to keep pursuing this for ever. When the Government sets out the budget, should it also say how, if we were to get an extra billion pounds during the year from Westminster or for some other reason, we would spend that extra billion pounds or, if funds from Westminster or our tax revenues were to fall by a billion pounds, how we would save a billion pounds? Do you want it to be so specific that, at the beginning of the year, we say, “This is the budget that we’re hoping for, but this is what we would do if we didn’t manage it”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Although we might improve outcomes a bit, does public service reform basically mean cutting jobs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Paragraph 14 of your report says that
“the Scottish Government risks overspending against its budget”
but, legally, the Scottish Government cannot overspend against its budget or, at least, against its income. What do you mean by that? The reality is that, by hook or by crook, the Government has to balance its budget.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Do you accept that that is quite difficult for the Government? Even if it does emergency planning a year ahead, there is still a limited number of spaces where it can save money.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Yet, almost counter to that, if the Government does not make longer-term commitments, in a sense, it would have more flexibility. The two kind of go together. If it gave just one-year grants to the third sector, it would have total flexibility to stop those grants the next year, and yet the third sector is always demanding, or asking for, a longer-term plan. If we get a longer-term plan from Westminster, that would obviously help, and then we could have a longer-term plan that would help local government and the third sector following on from that.
Whenever we make longer-term commitments, such as on social security, that reduces our ability to be flexible, does it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
I will go back to Mary Morgan and to some of the stuff that we have touched on about what is done nationally and what is done locally. One of the biggest public sector reforms in recent years has been the changes to the police and the fire service, which went from having eight local boards to one national board.
I do not expect you to answer all the questions, but how would that work with regard to the health service? Would it come from the health boards saying, “We want to join up with each other,” or does it need to come from the top, with the Government, saying, “We are going to put you all together”? Is there space for doing a bit more nationally or a bit less nationally?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
John Mason
Regarding the point about head count, when I read the reports I was struck by the fact that Registers of Scotland has cut its workforce by 10 per cent. Chris Kerr can maybe comment on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
John Mason
At the moment, parents—better-off parents, obviously—contribute some of the money, and schools fundraise for some of the other kids. Some of the £30 million that the Government would be paying would go not to the centres or the kids but, in effect, to parents—it would save better-off parents money. I have a slight problem with that. If parents are willing to contribute several million pounds a year at the moment—we probably do not have the figures, but I assume that it is about that much—is it fair to suddenly save those parents a lot of money?